Literature DB >> 10772357

The discrete-choice willingness-to-pay question format in health economics: should we adopt environmental guidelines?

R D Smith1.   

Abstract

The use of willingness to pay (WTP) in valuing the benefits of health care programs is increasing. Although such values have been derived using open-ended, bidding, or payment-card techniques, recently discrete-choice questionnaires have been advocated, particularly following the report of the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration concerning the validity of using WTP to estimate environmental benefits. It is argued that discrete-choice questions offer a more realistic market, and will therefore lead to more valid responses and yield higher response rates through reduced mental demands. The author reviews these issues in a critical assessment of discrete-choice questions.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10772357     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0002000205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  17 in total

1.  Unexpected yes- and no-answering behaviour in the discrete choice approach to elicit willingness to pay: a methodological comparison with payment cards.

Authors:  Thomas Hammerschmidt; Hans-Peter Zeitler; Reiner Leidl
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2003-09

2.  The measurement of contingent valuation for health economics.

Authors:  Ahmed M Bayoumi
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Willingness-to-pay and demand curves: a comparison of results obtained using different elicitation formats.

Authors:  David K Whynes; Emma J Frew; Jane L Wolstenholme
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2005-12

Review 4.  A 'league table' of contingent valuation results for pharmaceutical interventions: a hard pill to swallow?

Authors:  Tracey H Sach; Richard D Smith; David K Whynes
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Older adults place lower value on choice relative to young adults.

Authors:  Joseph A Mikels; Andrew E Reed; Kosali I Simon
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Determinants of willingness to pay for a new therapy in a sample of menopausal-aged women.

Authors:  Andrej Rasch; Jan-Marc Hodek; Claus Runge; Wolfgang Greiner
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  The cost-effectiveness of cash versus lottery incentives for a web-based, stated-preference community survey.

Authors:  Aleksandra Gajic; David Cameron; Jeremiah Hurley
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-06-21

8.  Patient Willingness to Pay for Reductions in Chronic Low Back Pain and Chronic Neck Pain.

Authors:  Patricia M Herman; Jill E Luoto; Mallika Kommareddi; Melony E Sorbero; Ian D Coulter
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 5.820

9.  A Cross-sectional Examination of What Smokers Perceive to be Important and Their Willingness to Pay for Tobacco Cessation Medications.

Authors:  Shanta R Dube; Michael F Pesko; Xin Xu
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

Review 10.  The impact of economic evaluation on quality management in spine surgery.

Authors:  Norbert Boos
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.