Literature DB >> 10769306

Specialized neural systems underlying representations of sequential movements.

D L Harrington1, S M Rao, K Y Haaland, J A Bobholz, A R Mayer, J R Binderx, R W Cox.   

Abstract

The ease by which movements are combined into skilled actions depends on many factors, including the complexity of movement sequences. Complexity can be defined by the surface structure of a sequence, including motoric properties such as the types of effectors, and by the abstract or sequence-specific structure, which is apparent in the relations amongst movements, such as repetitions. It is not known whether different neural systems support the cognitive and the sensorimotor processes underlying different structural properties of sequential actions. We investigated this question using whole-brain functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in healthy adults as they performed sequences of five key presses involving up to three fingers. The structure of sequences was defined by two factors that independently lengthen the time to plan sequences before movement: the number of different fingers (1-3; surface structure) and the number of finger transitions (0-4; sequence-specific structure). The results showed that systems involved in visual processing (extrastriate cortex) and the preparation of sensory aspects of movement (rostral inferior parietal and ventral premotor cortex (PMv)) correlated with both properties of sequence structure. The number of different fingers positively correlated with activation intensity in the cerebellum and superior parietal cortex (anterior), systems associated with sensorimotor, and kinematic representations of movement, respectively. The number of finger transitions correlated with activation in systems previously associated with sequence-specific processing, including the inferior parietal and the dorsal premotor cortex (PMd), and in interconnecting superior temporal-middle frontal gyrus networks. Different patterns of activation in the left and right inferior parietal cortex were associated with different sequences, consistent with the speculation that sequences are encoded using different mnemonics, depending on the sequence-specific structure. In contrast, PMd activation correlated positively with increases in the number of transitions, consistent with the role of this area in the retrieval or preparation of abstract action plans. These findings suggest that the surface and the sequence-specific structure of sequential movements can be distinguished by distinct distributed systems that support their underlying mental operations.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10769306     DOI: 10.1162/08989290051137602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  39 in total

1.  The differential role of premotor frontal cortex and basal ganglia in motor sequence learning: evidence from focal basal ganglia lesions.

Authors:  Cornelia Exner; Janka Koschack; Eva Irle
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Simple and complex movement-associated functional MRI changes in patients at presentation with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Massimo Filippi; Maria A Rocca; Domenico M Mezzapesa; Angelo Ghezzi; Andrea Falini; Vittorio Martinelli; Giuseppe Scotti; Giancarlo Comi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Reduced recruitment of motor association areas during bimanual coordination in concert pianists.

Authors:  Bernhard Haslinger; Peter Erhard; Eckart Altenmüller; Andreas Hennenlotter; Markus Schwaiger; Helga Gräfin von Einsiedel; Ernst Rummeny; Bastian Conrad; Andrés O Ceballos-Baumann
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Temporal dynamics of ipsilateral and contralateral motor activity during voluntary finger movement.

Authors:  Ming-Xiong Huang; Deborah L Harrington; Kim M Paulson; Michael P Weisend; Roland R Lee
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  The effect of tapping finger and mode differences on cortical and subcortical activities: a PET study.

Authors:  Tomoko Aoki; Hayato Tsuda; Masashi Takasawa; Yasuhiro Osaki; Naohiko Oku; Jun Hatazawa; Hiroshi Kinoshita
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-09-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Distinct neural systems underlie learning visuomotor and spatial representations of motor skills.

Authors:  Michael W Parsons; Deborah L Harrington; Stephen M Rao
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Improved motor sequence retention by motionless listening.

Authors:  Amir Lahav; Tal Katz; Roxanne Chess; Elliot Saltzman
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-03-21

8.  Effects of long-term practice and task complexity in musicians and nonmusicians performing simple and complex motor tasks: implications for cortical motor organization.

Authors:  Ingo Meister; Timo Krings; Henrik Foltys; Babak Boroojerdi; Mareike Müller; Rudolf Töpper; Armin Thron
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Extensive training of elementary finger tapping movements changes the pattern of motor cortex excitability.

Authors:  S Koeneke; K Lutz; U Herwig; U Ziemann; L Jäncke
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in long-term survivors of childhood leukemia.

Authors:  Kevin R Krull; Raja B Khan; Kirsten K Ness; Davonna Ledet; Liang Zhu; Ching-Hon Pui; Scott C Howard; Deo Kumar Srivastava; Noah D Sabin; Melissa M Hudson; E Brannon Morris
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.