Literature DB >> 10768801

Process of conducting a 5-a-day intervention with high school students: Gimme 5 (Louisiana).

T A Nicklas1, C E O'Neil.   

Abstract

Gimme 5: A Fresh Nutrition Concept for Students (Gimme 5) was a 4-year intervention targeting increased fruit and vegetable consumption by high school students. Twelve schools were randomized to intervention or control conditions. The cohort (2,213 students; 56% female, 84% Euro-American) were followed from 9th to 12th grade. Interventions were composed of a school-based media campaign, classroom workshops, school meal modification, and parental involvement. For each of the four Gimme 5 intervention components, process evaluation measures were developed to assess program dose, penetration, and utilization, as well as external competing factors. Process evaluation results are presented to illustrate the various functions of process evaluation data. These include, but are not limited to, describing program implementation, quality control and monitoring, and explaining study outcomes. The implementation of process evaluation systems to complement the outcome measures in a high school-based intervention provides useful strategies for a more comprehensive approach to program evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10768801     DOI: 10.1177/109019810002700206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Behav        ISSN: 1090-1981


  7 in total

1.  The effect of a healthy school tuck shop program on the access of students to healthy foods.

Authors:  Kirang Kim; Seo Ah Hong; Sung Ha Yun; Hyun Joo Ryou; Sang Sun Lee; Mi Kyung Kim
Journal:  Nutr Res Pract       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 1.926

2.  Identifying barriers that hinder onsite parental involvement in a school-based health promotion program.

Authors:  Oralia Garcia-Dominic; Linda A Wray; Roberto P Treviño; Arthur E Hernandez; Zenong Yin; Jan S Ulbrecht
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2009-04-01

3.  Bright Start: Description and main outcomes from a group-randomized obesity prevention trial in American Indian children.

Authors:  Mary Story; Peter J Hannan; Jayne A Fulkerson; Bonnie Holy Rock; Mary Smyth; Chrisa Arcan; John H Himes
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 5.002

Review 4.  Strategies for enhancing the implementation of school-based policies or practices targeting risk factors for chronic disease.

Authors:  Luke Wolfenden; Nicole K Nathan; Rachel Sutherland; Sze Lin Yoong; Rebecca K Hodder; Rebecca J Wyse; Tessa Delaney; Alice Grady; Alison Fielding; Flora Tzelepis; Tara Clinton-McHarg; Benjamin Parmenter; Peter Butler; John Wiggers; Adrian Bauman; Andrew Milat; Debbie Booth; Christopher M Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-29

Review 5.  Obesity prevention and the Health promoting Schools framework: essential components and barriers to success.

Authors:  Rebecca Langford; Christopher Bonell; Hayley Jones; Rona Campbell
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 6.457

6.  Professionals' Recommended Strategies to Improve Australian Adolescents' Knowledge of Nutrition and Food Systems.

Authors:  Sanaz Sadegholvad; Heather Yeatman; Anne-Maree Parrish; Anthony Worsley
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Process evaluation results from a school- and community-linked intervention: the Trial of Activity for Adolescent Girls (TAAG).

Authors:  D R Young; A Steckler; S Cohen; C Pratt; G Felton; S G Moe; J Pickrel; C C Johnson; M Grieser; L A Lytle; J-S Lee; B Raburn
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2008-06-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.