| Literature DB >> 22513491 |
Mary Story1, Peter J Hannan, Jayne A Fulkerson, Bonnie Holy Rock, Mary Smyth, Chrisa Arcan, John H Himes.
Abstract
The aim of the Bright Start study was to develop and test the effectiveness of a school environment intervention, supplemented with family involvement, to reduce excessive weight gain by increasing physical activity and healthy eating practices among kindergarten and first-grade American Indian children. Bright Start was a group-randomized, school-based trial involving 454 children attending 14 schools on the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota. Children were followed from the beginning of their kindergarten year through the end of first grade. Main outcome variables were mean BMI, mean percent body fat, and prevalence of overweight/obese children. The goals of the intervention were to: increase physical activity at school to at least 60 min/day; modify school meals and snacks; and involve families in making behavioral and environmental changes at home. At baseline, 32% of boys and 25% of girls were overweight/obese. Although the intervention was not associated with statistically significant change in mean levels of BMI, BMI-Z, skinfolds or percentage body fat, the intervention was associated with a statistically significant net decrease of 10% in the prevalence of overweight. Intervention children experienced a 13.4% incidence of overweight, whereas the control children experienced a corresponding incidence of 24.8%; a difference of -11.4% (P = 0.033). The intervention significantly reduced parent-reported mean child intakes of sugar-sweetened beverages, whole milk, and chocolate milk. Changes in duration of school physical activity were not significant. Because obesity is the most daunting health challenge facing American Indian children today, more intervention research is needed to identify effective approaches.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22513491 PMCID: PMC3407274 DOI: 10.1038/oby.2012.89
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) ISSN: 1930-7381 Impact factor: 5.002
Characteristics of Bright Start children at baseline by gender and study condition.
| All | Intervention | Control | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Mean | (SD) | N | Mean | (SD) | N | Mean | (SD) | |
| Boys | |||||||||
| Age (years) | 232 | 5.84 | (0.53) | 138 | 5.87 | (0.54) | 94 | 5.80 | (0.51) |
| Waist Circumf. (cm) | 227 | 58.31 | (7.28) | 136 | 58.91 | (7.82) | 91 | 57.42 | (6.35) |
| Triceps (mm) | 224 | 9.87 | (4.30) | 135 | 10.23 | (4.73) | 89 | 9.34 | (3.52) |
| Subscap (mm) | 227 | 6.59 | (3.36) | 136 | 6.91 | (3.83) | 91 | 6.11 | (2.43) |
| Percent fat (%) | 225 | 19.20 | (6.30) | 135 | 19.73 | (6.89) | 90 | 18.40 | (5.24) |
| BMI kg/m2 | 227 | 16.83 | (2.85) | 136 | 17.06 | (3.23) | 91 | 16.48 | (2.13) |
| BMI_z (standardized) | 227 | 0.58 | (1.20) | 136 | 0.65 | (1.23) | 91 | 0.48 | (1.15) |
| Overweight (85th – <95th percentile) | 227 | 17% | (39%) | 136 | 16% | (22%) | 91 | 19% | (17%) |
| Obese (≥95th percentile) | 227 | 15% | (35%) | 136 | 18% | (24%) | 91 | 13% | (12%) |
| Girls | |||||||||
| Age (years) | 222 | 5.76 | (0.48) | 129 | 5.76 | (0.47) | 93 | 5.77 | (0.49) |
| Waist Circumf. (cm) | 210 | 57.60 | (7.17) | 126 | 57.40 | (6.69) | 84 | 57.89 | (7.87) |
| Triceps (mm) | 210 | 11.20 | (4.95) | 126 | 11.07 | (4.36) | 84 | 11.39 | (5.74) |
| Subscap (mm) | 209 | 7.49 | (4.49) | 125 | 7.44 | (4.00) | 84 | 7.57 | (5.16) |
| Percent fat (%) | 209 | 15.52 | (8.43) | 123 | 15.64 | (8.28) | 86 | 15.34 | (8.69) |
| BMI kg/m2 | 213 | 16.46 | (2.92) | 127 | 16.43 | (2.74) | 86 | 16.51 | (3.18) |
| BMI_z (standardized) | 213 | 0.39 | (1.13) | 127 | 0.38 | (1.18) | 86 | 0.41 | (1.06) |
| Overweight (85th – <95th percentile) | 213 | 11% | (24%) | 127 | 15% | 19% | 86 | 6% | 5% |
| Obese (≥95th percentile) | 213 | 14% | (30%) | 127 | 14% | (18%) | 86 | 14% | (12%) |
SD: Standard Deviation
Adjusted‡ mean levels of fatness-related measures at Baseline and Final by randomization condition, and net difference between intervention and control schools.
| Baseline | Final (Round 4) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Control | Intervention | Control | Net difference | |||||||
| Outcome | Mean | (SE) | Mean | (SE) | Mean | (SE) | Mean | (SE) | Effect | (SE) | Prob t |
| BMI kg/m2 | 16.85 | (0.30) | 16.52 | (0.36) | 18.29 | (0.31) | 17.62 | (0.36) | 0.34 | (0.17) | 0.057 |
| BMI_z (standardized) | 0.58 | (0.12) | 0.42 | (0.14) | 0.80 | (0.12) | 0.64 | (0.14) | 0.01 | (0.07) | 0.904 |
| Triceps (mm) | 10.84 | (0.50) | 10.45 | (0.59) | 11.91 | (0.50) | 11.50 | (0.60) | 0.02 | (0.67) | 0.978 |
| Subscap (mm) | 7.33 | (0.47) | 6.93 | (0.55) | 9.43 | (0.47) | 8.99 | (0.56) | 0.05 | (0.44) | 0.909 |
| % Body Fat | 17.75 | (0.79) | 16.84 | (0.93) | 22.02 | (0.79) | 20.21 | (0.93) | 0.90 | (0.57) | 0.122 |
| % Overwt (85th – <95th pct) | 15.80 | (2.55) | 12.52 | (3.12) | 15.45 | (2.62) | 22.31 | (3.23) | −10.14 | (4.14) | 0.019 |
| % Obese (≥95th pct) | 17.01 | (3.44) | 14.01 | (4.08) | 25.68 | (3.47) | 20.57 | (4.13) | 2.11 | (3.11) | 0.503 |
Adjusted for age, gender, and relative SES; and school within condition as a random effect.
Degrees of freedom (df) for p-value assessing the intervention effect are 36, except for the triceps and subscap for which df=12.
Selected nutrients from school menus for breakfast, lunch, and snacks served at Baseline and Round 4 by study condition‡
| Baseline | Final (Round 4) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Control | Intervention | Control | Net effect of intervention | |||||||
| Mean | (SD) | Mean | (SD) | Mean | (SD) | Mean | (SD) | Mean | (SD) | Prob t† | |
| Kcalories | 1186 | (57.1) | 1190 | (57.1) | 1162 | (57.1) | 1204 | (57.0) | −37.3 | (91.5) | 0.691 |
| Carbohydrate (g) | 164.5 | (8.2) | 171.9 | (8.2) | 166.8 | (8.2) | 162.7 | (8.2) | 11.5 | (16.0) | 0.487 |
| Protein (g) | 46.89 | (1.87) | 47.68 | (1.87) | 49.08 | (1.87) | 50.12 | (1.87) | −0.26 | (2.98) | 0.933 |
| Fat (g) | 40.92 | (3.52) | 38.71 | (3.52) | 35.47 | (3.52) | 41.08 | (3.52) | −7.81 | (4.15) | 0.085 |
| % total fat calories | 31.00 | (1.96) | 28.40 | (1.96) | 26.77 | (1.96) | 32.17 | (1.93) | −8.00 | (2.26) | 0.004 |
| % calories SAFA | 11.72 | (0.72) | 9.29 | (0.72) | 9.52 | (0.72) | 11.16 | (0.7) | −4.08 | (1.03) | 0.002 |
| Iron (mg) | 8.55 | (0.48) | 8.78 | (0.48) | 7.59 | (0.48) | 7.98 | (0.44) | −0.16 | (0.99) | 0.877 |
| Magnesium (mg) | 161.0 | (7.8) | 162.8 | (7.80) | 159.9 | (7.80) | 157.7 | (7.8) | 3.9 | (11.5) | 0.740 |
| Calcium (mg) | 846 | (166) | 862 | (166) | 900 | (166) | 852 | (166) | 64 | (287.15) | 0.827 |
| Sodium (mg) | 2032 | (114) | 2114 | (114) | 1759 | (114) | 1937 | (114) | −96 | (191.54) | 0.624 |
Figure 1Mean physical activity from teacher report, combining recess and physical education class by round of data collection in intervention (solid line) and control (broken line) schools
Frequency of intervention children in both cohorts attending family events and participating in motivational callsa
| Family Fun Night events | Children attending event | Children eligible for call | At least one call attempted | Completed calls |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n(%) | (n) | (%) | (%) | |
| Event 1 | 130 (48.7) | 94 | 100 | 69.1 |
| Event 2 | 95 (35.6) | 47 | 100 | 53.2 |
| Event 3 | 59 (22.1) | 31 | --- | --- |
| Summer | 21 (7.9) | 11 | --- | --- |
Motivational calls suspended after Event 2 due to lack of telephone access
Adjusted mean food intakes at round 4 reported by parent and net intervention effect.
| Intervention | Control | Net Effect | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foods | Mean | (SE) | Mean | (SE) | Mean | (SE) | Prob t |
| Vegetables | 0.83 | (0.05) | 0.81 | (0.06) | 0.02 | (0.08) | 0.788 |
| Fruit | 0.84 | (0.04) | 0.76 | (0.05) | 0.07 | (0.06) | 0.269 |
| Sweetened Beverages | 0.96 | (0.07) | 1.25 | (0.09) | − 0.28 | (0.11) | 0.024 |
| Whole Milk | 0.78 | (0.04) | 1.00 | (0.06) | − 0.22 | (0.07) | 0.011 |
| Skim Milk | 0.45 | (0.05) | 0.33 | (0.06) | 0.12 | (0.07) | 0.138 |
| Chocolate Milk | 0.27 | (0.04) | 0.43 | (0.05) | − 0.17 | (0.06) | 0.025 |
| 100% Juice | 0.68 | (0.04) | 0.70 | (0.05) | − 0.03 | (0.06) | 0.689 |
| Bottled Water | 0.84 | (0.07) | 0.75 | (0.08) | 0.09 | (0.11) | 0.413 |
| Fast Food | 0.21 | (0.03) | 0.17 | (0.03) | 0.04 | (0.04) | 0.374 |
Net intervention effect is calculated from the regression models. Regression models were adjusted for food intake at baseline, gender, school (random within condition), SES score, and intervention condition.