M J McLean1, A A Bukhari, A W Wamil. 1. Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The effects of topiramate (TPM) on sodium-dependent action potentials were studied by using cultured mouse spinal cord neurons. METHODS: The ability of TPM to limit (block) depolarization-induced spontaneous repetitive firing (SRF) was determined and compared with corresponding effects of phenytoin (PHT) and lamotrigine (LTG) in cultured mouse spinal neurons. RESULTS: Topiramate at concentrations of > or =3 microM caused a voltage-sensitive and time-dependent limitation of SRF that was associated with a decrease in the velocity of the upstroke of the action potential. At high concentrations (30-600 microM), TPM rapidly blocked SRF in about one third of the neurons tested and did not affect SRF in about one third. In some neurons, TPM caused an intermittent limitation (sputtering) of SRF (approximately 30% of the neurons) or blocked SRF only after a delay of several seconds (approximately 10%). This complex pattern of effects is distinctly different from that of PHT and LTG, in which the effect was always a rapid limitation or complete blockade of SRF. Another difference between TPM and the other anticonvulsants (AEDs) is that the effects of TPM were more dependent on the length of time the neurons were exposed to the compound and the intensity or duration of neuronal activity. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study do not support the concept that Na+ channel blockade is the primary mechanism responsible for the anticonvulsant activity of TPM.
PURPOSE: The effects of topiramate (TPM) on sodium-dependent action potentials were studied by using cultured mouse spinal cord neurons. METHODS: The ability of TPM to limit (block) depolarization-induced spontaneous repetitive firing (SRF) was determined and compared with corresponding effects of phenytoin (PHT) and lamotrigine (LTG) in cultured mouse spinal neurons. RESULTS:Topiramate at concentrations of > or =3 microM caused a voltage-sensitive and time-dependent limitation of SRF that was associated with a decrease in the velocity of the upstroke of the action potential. At high concentrations (30-600 microM), TPM rapidly blocked SRF in about one third of the neurons tested and did not affect SRF in about one third. In some neurons, TPM caused an intermittent limitation (sputtering) of SRF (approximately 30% of the neurons) or blocked SRF only after a delay of several seconds (approximately 10%). This complex pattern of effects is distinctly different from that of PHT and LTG, in which the effect was always a rapid limitation or complete blockade of SRF. Another difference between TPM and the other anticonvulsants (AEDs) is that the effects of TPM were more dependent on the length of time the neurons were exposed to the compound and the intensity or duration of neuronal activity. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study do not support the concept that Na+ channel blockade is the primary mechanism responsible for the anticonvulsant activity of TPM.
Authors: G Curia; P Aracri; E Colombo; P Scalmani; M Mantegazza; G Avanzini; S Franceschetti Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2007-02-05 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: M Inghilleri; F Gilio; A Conte; V Frasca; C Marini Bettolo; E Iacovelli; B Gregori; M Prencipe; A Berardelli Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2006-08-05 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Sophia Pan Wang; Scott Mintzer; Christopher T Skidmore; Tingting Zhan; Erika Stuckert; Maromi Nei; Michael R Sperling Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2012-08-29 Impact factor: 5.864