Literature DB >> 10767783

Testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in the southeastern United States.

A Miron1, J M Schildkraut, B K Rimer, E P Winer, C Sugg Skinner, P A Futreal, D Culler, B Calingaert, S Clark, P Kelly Marcom, J D Iglehart.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To detail characterization of mutations and uncharacterized variants in the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, as observed in a population of breast cancer patients from the southeastern United States, and to examine baseline characteristics of women referred for counseling and testing and provide a preliminary look at how counseling and testing affected intentions toward prophylactic surgery.
BACKGROUND: Mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes give rise to a dramatically increased risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer or both. There are many reports about special populations in which deleterious mutations are present at a high frequency. It is useful to study these genes in more heterogeneous populations, reflecting different geographic regions. Interest in preventive surgery for gene carriers is high in women and their surgeons.
METHODS: Women were recruited through a prospective clinical trial of counseling and free genetic testing. BRCA1 and BRCA2 were screened for mutations using standard techniques, and results were given to participants. Baseline questionnaires determined interest in preventive surgery at the beginning of the study. Follow-up questionnaires for those who completed testing surveyed interest in prophylactic surgery after counseling and receiving test results.
RESULTS: Of 213 women who completed counseling and testing, 44 (20.6%) had 29 separate mutations; there were 11 Jewish women carrying three founder mutations. Twenty-eight women (13.1%) had uncharacterized variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2; nine were not previously reported. Women overestimated their chances of possessing a deleterious gene mutation compared to a statistical estimate of carrier risk. A number of women changed their intentions toward preventive surgery after genetic counseling and testing.
CONCLUSIONS: Hereditary breast cancer due to mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 was a heterogeneous syndrome in the southeastern United States. Most mutations were seen just once, and uncharacterized variants were common and of uncertain clinical significance. In general, positive test results tended to reinforce intentions toward prophylactic surgery. In contrast, women not interested in surgery at the time of entry tended to remain reluctant after testing and counseling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10767783      PMCID: PMC1421049          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200005000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  32 in total

Review 1.  Genetic counseling for breast cancer.

Authors:  S Clark; J D Iglehart
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  1999

2.  Probability of carrying a mutation of breast-ovarian cancer gene BRCA1 based on family history.

Authors:  D A Berry; G Parmigiani; J Sanchez; J Schildkraut; E Winer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-02-05       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  "Talking About Chance": The Presentation of Risk Information During Genetic Counseling for Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  N Hallowell; H Statham; F Murton; J Green; M Richards
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews.

Authors:  J P Struewing; P Hartge; S Wacholder; S M Baker; M Berlin; M McAdams; M M Timmerman; L C Brody; M A Tucker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Younger women at increased risk for breast cancer: perceived risk, psychological well-being, and surveillance behavior.

Authors:  C Lerman; K Kash; M Stefanek
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1994

6.  Twenty-year follow-up of the breast cancers diagnosed during the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project.

Authors:  C R Smart; C Byrne; R A Smith; L Garfinkel; A H Letton; G D Dodd; O H Beahrs
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Determining carrier probabilities for breast cancer-susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Authors:  G Parmigiani; D Berry; O Aguilar
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Low proportion of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Finnish breast cancer families: evidence for additional susceptibility genes.

Authors:  P Vehmanen; L S Friedman; H Eerola; M McClure; B Ward; L Sarantaus; T Kainu; K Syrjäkoski; S Pyrhönen; O P Kallioniemi; T Muhonen; M Luce; T S Frank; H Nevanlinna
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Genetic counseling for families with inherited susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  B B Biesecker; M Boehnke; K Calzone; D S Markel; J E Garber; F S Collins; B L Weber
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-04-21       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Breast and ovarian cancer incidence in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D F Easton; D Ford; D T Bishop
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Experiences of individuals with a variant of uncertain significance on genetic testing for hereditary cancer risks: a mixed method systematic review.

Authors:  Danielle Gould; Rachel Walker; Grace Makari-Judson; Memnun Seven
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-07-12

2.  Validity of models for predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  Giovanni Parmigiani; Sining Chen; Edwin S Iversen; Tara M Friebel; Dianne M Finkelstein; Hoda Anton-Culver; Argyrios Ziogas; Barbara L Weber; Andrea Eisen; Kathleen E Malone; Janet R Daling; Li Hsu; Elaine A Ostrander; Leif E Peterson; Joellen M Schildkraut; Claudine Isaacs; Camille Corio; Leoni Leondaridis; Gail Tomlinson; Christopher I Amos; Louise C Strong; Donald A Berry; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Sharon Sand; Debra Dutson; Rich Kerber; Beth N Peshkin; David M Euhus
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Cancer genetic risk assessment for individuals at risk of familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer S Hilgart; Bernadette Coles; Rachel Iredale
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-02-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.