Literature DB >> 10767584

CT number variations due to different image acquisition and reconstruction parameters: a thorax phantom study.

R Groell1, R Rienmueller, G J Schaffler, H R Portugaller, E Graif, P Willfurth.   

Abstract

A humanoid thorax phantom containing six compartments was scanned with two different computed tomography (CT) scanners using various image acquisition and reconstruction parameters. The differences of CT numbers were statistically significant between the two CT scanners for each compartment (p<0.001) except for the "air" compartment. The variabilities of the CT numbers are described for the different parameters. The mean CT numbers of the "water" compartment, for instance, ranged from 1 to 15HU (Hounsfield Units), those of the "air" compartment varied from -962 to -990HU. Knowledge of these CT number variabilities is necessary when CT numbers are used for tissue characterization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10767584     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-6111(99)00043-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph        ISSN: 0895-6111            Impact factor:   4.790


  14 in total

1.  Quantitative contrast-enhanced computed tomography: is there a need for system calibration?

Authors:  Kenneth A Miles; Helen Young; Sandra L Chica; Peter D Esser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Can CT scan protocols used for radiotherapy treatment planning be adjusted to optimize image quality and patient dose? A systematic review.

Authors:  Anne T Davis; Antony L Palmer; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Quantitative evaluation of internal marks made using MRgFUS as seen on MRI, CT, US, and digital color images - a pilot study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hipp; Xiaobing Fan; Ari Partanen; James Vosicky; Charles A Pelizzari; Christopher M Straus; Sham Sokka; Gregory S Karczmar
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 2.685

4.  Comparison of volume and attenuation of the spleen between postmortem and antemortem computed tomography.

Authors:  Hidemi Okuma; Wataru Gonoi; Masanori Ishida; Go Shirota; Shigeaki Kanno; Yukako Shintani; Hiroyuki Abe; Masashi Fukayama; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Emphysema quantification in inflation-fixed lungs using low-dose computed tomography and 3He magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  David S Gierada; Jason C Woods; Richard E Jacob; Andrew J Bierhals; Cliff K Choong; Seth T Bartel; Yulin V Chang; Nitin A Das; Cheng Hong; Barbara A Lutey; Jon H Ritter; Thomas K Pilgram; Joel D Cooper; G Alexander Patterson; Richard J Battafarano; Bryan F Meyers; Dmitriy A Yablonskiy; Mark S Conradi
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Are Hounsfield Unit Measurements of Bony Absorption Changes in Cholesteatoma Helpful?

Authors:  Shay Shemesh; Judith Luckman; Tal Marom; Oded Kraus; Sharon Ovnat Tamir
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-11

7.  Internal calibration for opportunistic computed tomography muscle density analysis.

Authors:  Ainsley C J Smith; Justin J Tse; Tadiwa H Waungana; Kirsten N Bott; Michael T Kuczynski; Andrew S Michalski; Steven K Boyd; Sarah L Manske
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Comparison of attenuation of striated muscle between postmortem and antemortem computed tomography: results of a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Hidemi Okuma; Wataru Gonoi; Masanori Ishida; Go Shirota; Yukako Shintani; Hiroyuki Abe; Masashi Fukayama; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Computed tomography imaging parameters for inhomogeneity correction in radiation treatment planning.

Authors:  Indra J Das; Chee-Wai Cheng; Minsong Cao; Peter A S Johnstone
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

Review 10.  Advancements in Osteoporosis Imaging, Screening, and Study of Disease Etiology.

Authors:  Justin J Tse; Ainsley C J Smith; Michael T Kuczynski; Daphne A Kaketsis; Sarah L Manske
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.