Literature DB >> 10767067

Free-breathing 3D coronary MRA: the impact of "isotropic" image resolution.

R M Botnar1, M Stuber, K V Kissinger, W J Manning.   

Abstract

During conventional x-ray coronary angiography, multiple projections of the coronary arteries are acquired to define coronary anatomy precisely. Due to time constraints, coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) usually provides only one or two views of the major coronary vessels. A coronary MRA approach that allowed for reconstruction of arbitrary isotropic orientations might therefore be desirable. The purpose of the study was to develop a three-dimensional (3D) coronary MRA technique with isotropic image resolution in a relatively short scanning time that allows for reconstruction of arbitrary views of the coronary arteries without constraints given by anisotropic voxel size. Eight healthy adult subjects were examined using a real-time navigator-gated and corrected free-breathing interleaved echoplanar (TFE-EPI) 3D-MRA sequence. Two 3D datasets were acquired for the left and right coronary systems in each subject, one with anisotropic (1.0 x 1.5 x 3.0 mm, 10 slices) and one with "near" isotropic (1.0 x 1.5 x 1.0 mm, 30 slices) image resolution. All other imaging parameters were maintained. In all cases, the entire left main (LM) and extensive portions of the left anterior descending (LAD) and the right coronary artery (RCA) were visualized. Objective assessment of coronary vessel sharpness was similar (41% +/- 5% vs. 42% +/- 5%; P = NS) between in-plane and through-plane views with "isotropic" voxel size but differed (32% +/- 7% vs. 23% +/- 4%; P < 0.001) with nonisotropic voxel size. In reconstructed views oriented in the through-plane direction, the vessel border was 86% more defined (P < 0.01) for isotropic compared with anisotropic images. A smaller (30%; P < 0.001) improvement was seen for in-plane reconstructions. Vessel diameter measurements were view independent (2.81 +/- 0.45 mm vs. 2.66 +/- 0.52 mm; P = NS) for isotropic, but differed (2.71 +/- 0.51 mm vs. 3.30 +/- 0.38 mm; P < 0.001) between anisotropic views. Average scanning time was 2:31 +/- 0:57 minutes for anisotropic and 7:11 +/- 3:02 minutes for isotropic image resolution (P < 0.001). We present a new approach for "near" isotropic 3D coronary artery imaging, which allows for reconstruction of arbitrary views of the coronary arteries. The good delineation of the coronary arteries in all views suggests that isotropic 3D coronary MRA might be a preferred technique for the assessment of coronary disease, although at the expense of prolonged scan times. Comparative studies with conventional x-ray angiography are needed to investigate the clinical utility of the isotropic strategy. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10767067     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2586(200004)11:4<389::aid-jmri6>3.0.co;2-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  11 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of coronary atherothrombosis.

Authors:  W Yong Kim; Elmar Spuentrup; Arno Buecker; Warren J Manning; René M Botnar
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Cardiac magnetic resonance in adults with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Sara L Partington; Anne Marie Valente
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep

3.  Whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0T using short-TR steady-state free precession, vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction.

Authors:  Jingsi Xie; Peng Lai; Himanshu Bhat; Debiao Li
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Non-invasive detection of vulnerable coronary plaque.

Authors:  Faisal Sharif; Derek G Lohan; William Wijns
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2011-07-26

5.  Contrast-kinetics-resolved whole-heart coronary MRA using 3DPR.

Authors:  Peng Lai; Feng Huang; Yu Li; Sonia Nielles-Vallespin; Xiaoming Bi; Renate Jerecic; Debiao Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Comparison between 2D and 3D high-resolution black-blood techniques for carotid artery wall imaging in clinically significant atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Niranjan Balu; Baocheng Chu; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan; Vasily L Yarnykh
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Coronary vessel wall evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: determinants of image quality.

Authors:  Ashkan A Malayeri; Robson Macedo; Debiao Li; Shaoguang Chen; Hossein Bahrami; Shenghan Lai; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Three-dimensional cine MRI in free-breathing infants and children with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Achim Seeger; Michael C Fenchel; Gerald F Greil; Petros Martirosian; Ulrich Kramer; Christiane Bretschneider; Joerg Doering; Claus D Claussen; Ludger Sieverding; Stephan Miller
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-10-02

9.  Beat-to-beat respiratory motion correction with near 100% efficiency: a quantitative assessment using high-resolution coronary artery imaging.

Authors:  Andrew D Scott; Jennifer Keegan; David N Firmin
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  Surgical reconstruction of the left main coronary artery with patch-angioplasty.

Authors:  Ivo Martinovic; Hans Greve
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 1.637

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.