Literature DB >> 10763692

Segmental cervical spine motion during orotracheal intubation of the intact and injured spine with and without external stabilization.

P J Lennarson1, D Smith, M M Todd, D Carras, P D Sawin, J Brayton, Y Sato, V C Traynelis.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The purpose of this study was to establish a cadaveric model for evaluating cervical spine motion in both the intact and injured states and to examine the efficacy of commonly used stabilization techniques in limiting that motion.
METHODS: Intubation was performed in fresh human cadavers with intact cervical spines, following the creation of a C4-5 posterior ligamentous injury. Movement of the cervical spine during direct laryngoscopy and intubation was recorded using video fluoroscopy and examined under the following conditions: 1) without external stabilization; 2) with manual in-line cervical immobilization; and 3) with Gardner-Wells traction. Subsequently, segmental motion of the occiput through C-5 (Oc-C5) was measured from digitized frames of the recorded video fluoroscopy. The predominant motion, at all levels measured in the intact spine, was extension. The greatest degree of motion occurred at the atlantooccipital (Oc-C1) junction, followed by the C1-2 junction, with progressively less motion at each more caudal level. After posterior destabilization was induced, the predominant direction of motion at C4-5 changed from extension to flexion, but the degree of motion remained among the least of all levels measured. Traction limited but did not prevent motion at the Oc-C1 junction, but neither traction nor immobilization limited motion at the destabilized C4-5 level.
CONCLUSIONS: Cadaveric cervical spine motion accurately reflected previously reported motion in living, anesthetized patients. Traction was the most effective method of reducing motion at the occipitocervical junction, but none of the interventions significantly reduced movement at the subaxial site of injury. These findings should be considered when treating injured patients requiring orotracheal intubation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10763692     DOI: 10.3171/spi.2000.92.2.0201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  20 in total

1.  Comparison of cervical spine motion during intubation with a C‑MAC D‑Blade® and an LMA Fastrach®.

Authors:  D Özkan; S Altınsoy; M Sayın; H Dolgun; J Ergil; A Dönmez
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Spinal movement and dural sac compression during airway management in a cadaveric model with atlanto-occipital instability.

Authors:  Shiyao Liao; Niko R E Schneider; Frank Weilbacher; Anne Stehr; Stefan Matschke; Paul A Grützner; Erik Popp; Michael Kreinest
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Football face-mask removal with a cordless screwdriver on helmets used for at least one season of play.

Authors:  Laura C Decoster; Chandra P Shirley; Erik E Swartz
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  A comparison of head movement during back boarding by motorized spine-board and log-roll techniques.

Authors:  Erik E Swartz; Jennifer Nowak; Chandra Shirley; Laura C Decoster
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 5.  [Prehospital management of spinal cord injuries].

Authors:  M Bernhard; A Gries; P Kremer; A Martin-Villalba; B W Böttiger
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  [Conventional intubation and laryngeal tube in cervical spine instability : Changes in the width of the dural sac in unfixed human body donors].

Authors:  F Weilbacher; N R E Schneider; S Liao; M Münzberg; M A Weigand; M Kreinest; E Popp
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Intubation Biomechanics: Laryngoscope Force and Cervical Spine Motion during Intubation in Cadavers-Cadavers versus Patients, the Effect of Repeated Intubations, and the Effect of Type II Odontoid Fracture on C1-C2 Motion.

Authors:  Bradley J Hindman; Robert P From; Ricardo B Fontes; Vincent C Traynelis; Michael M Todd; M Bridget Zimmerman; Christian M Puttlitz; Brandon G Santoni
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Functional cervical MRI within the scope of whiplash injuries: presentation of a new motion device for the cervical spine.

Authors:  Klaus Birnbaum; Uwe Maus; Josef Tacke
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  The 6-plus-person lift transfer technique compared with other methods of spine boarding.

Authors:  Gianluca Del Rossi; Marybeth H Horodyski; Bryan P Conrad; Christian P Di Paola; Matthew J Di Paola; Glenn R Rechtine
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  National athletic trainers' association position statement: acute management of the cervical spine-injured athlete.

Authors:  Erik E Swartz; Barry P Boden; Ronald W Courson; Laura C Decoster; MaryBeth Horodyski; Susan A Norkus; Robb S Rehberg; Kevin N Waninger
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.