BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced solid tumors may be included in phase I clinical trials. In such studies, the benefit expected is generally lower than the likelihood of toxicity and may even be non-existent if the patient's life expectancy is too short. This study was performed to identify prognostic variables for toxicity and survival in patients who participate in phase I clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-four patients treated on a phase I clinical trial in our institute were evaluated retrospectively. Univariable and multivariable analyses of patients' characteristics were undertaken to determine their effects on the probability of grade 3 and 4 toxicity and on survival. RESULTS: Grade 3 or 4 toxicity was experienced by 56 patients (36%): dosage level at entry (P < 0.001) and age over 65 years (P = 0.03) were independently associated with the risk of toxicity. Median overall survival was 5 months. The multivariable analysis identified performance status 2 or 3 (P < 0.001) and lactate dehydrogenase levels greater than 600 UI (P < 0.001) as independent adverse prognostic variables for overall survival. Using these two parameters, we determined a prognostic index which allowed us to discriminate three risk groups of patients with an observed median survival of 8.5, 4.5 and 1.5 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Subgroups with different survival expectancy can be identified among patients who are eligible for phase I clinical trials. If confirmed, the proposed prognostic model may be useful for therapeutic decision making in palliative oncology.
BACKGROUND:Patients with advanced solid tumors may be included in phase I clinical trials. In such studies, the benefit expected is generally lower than the likelihood of toxicity and may even be non-existent if the patient's life expectancy is too short. This study was performed to identify prognostic variables for toxicity and survival in patients who participate in phase I clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-four patients treated on a phase I clinical trial in our institute were evaluated retrospectively. Univariable and multivariable analyses of patients' characteristics were undertaken to determine their effects on the probability of grade 3 and 4 toxicity and on survival. RESULTS: Grade 3 or 4 toxicity was experienced by 56 patients (36%): dosage level at entry (P < 0.001) and age over 65 years (P = 0.03) were independently associated with the risk of toxicity. Median overall survival was 5 months. The multivariable analysis identified performance status 2 or 3 (P < 0.001) and lactate dehydrogenase levels greater than 600 UI (P < 0.001) as independent adverse prognostic variables for overall survival. Using these two parameters, we determined a prognostic index which allowed us to discriminate three risk groups of patients with an observed median survival of 8.5, 4.5 and 1.5 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Subgroups with different survival expectancy can be identified among patients who are eligible for phase I clinical trials. If confirmed, the proposed prognostic model may be useful for therapeutic decision making in palliative oncology.
Authors: Nicolas Penel; Nicolas Isambert; Pierre Leblond; Charles Ferte; Alain Duhamel; Jacques Bonneterre Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2009-01-10 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: A Schwandt; P J Harris; S Hunsberger; A Deleporte; G L Smith; D Vulih; B D Anderson; S P Ivy Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Audrey E Kam; Gopichand Pendurti; Umang H Shah; Mohammad H Ghalib; Imran Chaudhary; Jennifer Chuy; Lakshmi Rajdev; Andreas Kaubisch; Santiago Aparo; Ioannis Mantzaris; Sanjay Goel Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2018-10-12 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Jean-Marie Michot; Lina Benajiba; Laura Faivre; Capucine Baldini; Lelia Haddag; Clement Bonnet; Christophe Massard; Frederic Bigot; Camille Bigenwald; Benjamin Verret; Zoé A P Thomas; Andrea Varga; Anas Gazzah; Antoine Hollebecque; David Ghez; Julien Lazarovici; Rastilav Balheda; Aurore Jeanson; Sophie Postel-Vinay; Alina Danu; Jean-Charles Soria; Xavier Paoletti; Vincent Ribrag Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2017-06-09 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Mrinal M Gounder; Lakshmi Nayak; Solmaz Sahebjam; Alona Muzikansky; Armando J Sanchez; Serena Desideri; Xiaobu Ye; S Percy Ivy; L Burt Nabors; Michael Prados; Stuart Grossman; Lisa M DeAngelis; Patrick Y Wen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-08-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Filipa Lynce; Matthew J Blackburn; Ling Cai; Heping Wang; Larry Rubinstein; Pamela Harris; Claudine Isaacs; Paula R Pohlmann Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-11-08 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Camilla Zimmermann; Debika Burman; Shazeen Bandukwala; Dori Seccareccia; Ebru Kaya; John Bryson; Gary Rodin; Christopher Lo Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2009-07-23 Impact factor: 3.603