Literature DB >> 10761487

Benefits of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for colon polyps: a case-matched series.

T M Young-Fadok1, E Radice, H Nelson, W S Harmsen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the true benefits of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy by comparing clinical outcomes from a series of laparoscopic right colectomies with matched open colectomies, all performed for the singular indication of polyp not amenable to colonoscopic removal. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective case-matched study was performed of consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy for polyps between January 1992 and July 1997. Each case was matched to a control undergoing the equivalent open procedure for the same indication during the same time period.
RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy for polyps were identified, and matches were found. The conversion rate was 18.4% (7/38), 21.4% early in the series and 10% in later experience. Operative times were longer for laparoscopic-associated colectomy (median, 208 minutes vs 150 minutes, P < .001). Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy resulted in shorter postoperative ileus (time to flatus, 3.0 vs 4.0 days, P < .001; time to bowel movement, 3.5 vs 5.0 days, P < .001) and in earlier tolerance of regular diet (3.5 vs 6.0 days, P < .001). Fewer days of narcotic administration were required by the laparoscopic group (3.0 vs 4.5 days, P < .001). This resulted in a significantly shorter length of hospital stay (4.0 vs 7.0 days, P < .001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy has significant patient benefits. These benefits are apparent when procedures of equal complexity and equivalent indications are compared. Laparoscopic-assisted resection has become our preferred approach for polyps not amenable to colonoscopic polypectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10761487     DOI: 10.4065/75.4.344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  22 in total

1.  Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; Ravi P Kiran; Anthony J Senagore; Karen Brady; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  SAGES Appropriateness Conference: a summary.

Authors:  R E Glasgow; A Fingerhut; J Hunter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-09-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  [Laparoscopic colon surgery. Indications and technique].

Authors:  C-T Germer; J-P Ritz; H J Buhr
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis: a single institutional case-matched experience.

Authors:  David W Larson; Robert R Cima; Eric J Dozois; Michael Davies; Karen Piotrowicz; Sunni A Barnes; Bruce Wolff; John Pemberton
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Impact of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer on operative outcomes and survival.

Authors:  Wai Lun Law; Yee Man Lee; Hok Kwok Choi; Chi Leung Seto; Judy Wc Ho
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Laparoscopic colorectal resection for benign polyps not suitable for endoscopic polypectomy.

Authors:  Lena Hauenschild; Franz Georg Bader; Tilman Laubert; Ralf Czymek; Philipp Hildebrand; Uwe Johannes Roblick; Hans-Peter Bruch; Lutz Mirow
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Results of a multicenter study of 1,057 cases of rectal cancer treated by laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Nobuyoshi Miyajima; Masaki Fukunaga; Hirotoshi Hasegawa; Jun-ichi Tanaka; Junji Okuda; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Could laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery become the standard of care? A review and experience with 750 procedures.

Authors:  Christopher M Schlachta; Joseph Mamazza; Roger Gregoire; Stephen E Burpee; Eric C Poulin
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Short- and midterm outcomes of laparoscopic surgery compared for 131 patients with rectal and rectosigmoid cancer.

Authors:  H Hasegawa; Y Ishii; H Nishibori; T Endo; M Watanabe; M Kitajima
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Comparison of the clinical and economic outcomes between open and minimally invasive appendectomy and colectomy: evidence from a large commercial payer database.

Authors:  Terrence M Fullum; Joseph A Ladapo; Bijan J Borah; Candace L Gunnarsson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.