Literature DB >> 10761142

Mining and visualizing large anticancer drug discovery databases.

L M Shi1, Y Fan, J K Lee, M Waltham, D T Andrews, U Scherf, K D Paull, J N Weinstein.   

Abstract

In order to find more effective anticancer drugs, the U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI) screens a large number of compounds in vitro against 60 human cancer cell lines from different organs of origin. About 70,000 compounds have been tested in the program since 1990, and each tested compound can be characterized by a vector (i.e., "fingerprint") of 60 anticancer activity, or -[log(GI50)], values. GI50 is the concentration required to inhibit cell growth by 50% compared with untreated controls. Although cell growth inhibitory activity for a single cell line is not very informative, activity patterns across the 60 cell lines can provide incisive information on the mechanisms of action of screened compounds and also on molecular targets and modulators of activity within the cancer cells. Various statistical and artificial intelligence methods, including principal component analysis, hierarchical cluster analysis, stepwise linear regression, multidimensional scaling, neural network modeling, and genetic function approximation, among others, can be used to analyze this large activity database. Mining the database can provide useful information: (a) for the development of anticancer drugs; (b) for a better understanding of the molecular pharmacology of cancer; and (c) for improvement of the drug discovery process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10761142     DOI: 10.1021/ci990087b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci        ISSN: 0095-2338


  20 in total

Review 1.  Neural networks as robust tools in drug lead discovery and development.

Authors:  David A Winkler
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  DNA molecular recognition and cellular selectivity of anticancer metal(II) complexes of ethylenediaminediacetate and phenanthroline: multiple targets.

Authors:  Sze-Tin Von; Hoi-Ling Seng; Hong-Boon Lee; Seik-Weng Ng; Yusuke Kitamura; Makoto Chikira; Chew-Hee Ng
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.358

3.  Classification of a large anticancer data set by adaptive fuzzy partition.

Authors:  Nadège Piclin; Marco Pintore; Christophe Wechman; Jacques R Chrétien
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Induction of lysosomal membrane permeabilization by compounds that activate p53-independent apoptosis.

Authors:  Hamdiye Erdal; Maria Berndtsson; Juan Castro; Ulf Brunk; Maria C Shoshan; Stig Linder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Perturbational profiling of nanomaterial biologic activity.

Authors:  Stanley Y Shaw; Elizabeth C Westly; Mikael J Pittet; Aravind Subramanian; Stuart L Schreiber; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Accelerated structure-based design of chemically diverse allosteric modulators of a muscarinic G protein-coupled receptor.

Authors:  Yinglong Miao; Dahlia Anne Goldfeld; Ee Von Moo; Patrick M Sexton; Arthur Christopoulos; J Andrew McCammon; Celine Valant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Transcriptional profiling of sorghum induced by methyl jasmonate, salicylic acid, and aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid reveals cooperative regulation and novel gene responses.

Authors:  Ron A Salzman; Jeff A Brady; Scott A Finlayson; Christina D Buchanan; Elizabeth J Summer; Feng Sun; Patricia E Klein; Robert R Klein; Lee H Pratt; Marie-Michèle Cordonnier-Pratt; John E Mullet
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Comparing cDNA and oligonucleotide array data: concordance of gene expression across platforms for the NCI-60 cancer cells.

Authors:  Jae K Lee; Kimberly J Bussey; Fuad G Gwadry; William Reinhold; Gregory Riddick; Sandra L Pelletier; Satoshi Nishizuka; Gergely Szakacs; Jean-Phillipe Annereau; Uma Shankavaram; Samir Lababidi; Lawrence H Smith; Michael M Gottesman; John N Weinstein
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2003-11-25       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Investigating the correlations among the chemical structures, bioactivity profiles and molecular targets of small molecules.

Authors:  Tiejun Cheng; Yanli Wang; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Structural similarity assessment for drug sensitivity prediction in cancer.

Authors:  Pavithra Shivakumar; Michael Krauthammer
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.