Literature DB >> 10760441

Practical considerations in using calculated healthy-tissue complication probabilities for treatment-plan optimization.

M Zaider1, H I Amols.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Healthy and neoplastic tissues are generally exposed nonuniformly to ionizing radiation. It is thus useful to develop algorithms that predict the probability of tumor control or normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for any given spatial pattern of dose delivery. The questions addressed here concern: (a) the sensitivity of the NTCP predictions to the actual model used for extrapolation from uniform irradiation (where some clinical data exist) to nonuniform exposures, (b) its dependence on tissue type, and (c) consequences for treatment-plan optimization. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two (of several possible) NTCP formulations are used here: the Lyman model and a binomial equation. The effective volume-reduction scheme of Kutcher and Burman is used to obtain the NTCP for an arbitrary distribution of dose. NTCP was calculated for seven organs by postulating a dose distribution of maximum nonuniformity.
RESULTS: Both models fit available NTCP data well, but have very different extrapolations for exposures of small tissue volumes and very low values of NTCP (e.g., < 5%) where no data exist. Organs with pronounced volume effects (lung, kidneys) show substantial NTCP differences between the two models. Even in organs where the volume effect is small (e.g., spinal cord, brain), differences in NTCP due to the model selected may still have serious clinical consequences, as an actual example (for the spinal cord) indicates.
CONCLUSIONS: NTCP calculations based on extrapolations to volume fractions and/or NTCP levels for which reliable data do not exist depend on the model used to fit the data and the degree of dose nonuniformity. If NTCP is to be used in treatment-plan optimization, the prudent approach is to design plans that reproduce the conditions under which available dose-volume data were taken (e. g., uniform dose distributions).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10760441     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00014-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  5 in total

1.  Damage assessment in gastric cancer treatment with adjuvant radiochemotherapy: calculation of the NTCP's from the differential HDV of the organs at risk.

Authors:  Amadeo Wals; Jorge Contreras; José Macías; Inmaculada Fortes; Daniel Rivas; Pedro González; Ismael Herruzo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Use of gEUD for predicting ear and pituitary gland damage following proton and photon radiation therapy.

Authors:  L De Marzi; L Feuvret; T Boulé; J-L Habrand; F Martin; V Calugaru; N Fournier-Bidoz; R Ferrand; A Mazal
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Comparison of plan quality and delivery time between volumetric arc therapy (RapidArc) and Gamma Knife radiosurgery for multiple cranial metastases.

Authors:  Evan M Thomas; Richard A Popple; Xingen Wu; Grant M Clark; James M Markert; Barton L Guthrie; Yu Yuan; Michael C Dobelbower; Sharon A Spencer; John B Fiveash
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Evaluation of late rectal toxicity after conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a comparison between dose-volume constraints and NTCP use.

Authors:  Raffaella Cambria; Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa; Federica Cattani; Cristina Garibaldi; Dario Zerini; Cristiana Fodor; Flavia Serafini; Guido Pedroli; Roberto Orecchia
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Qualitative dosimetric and radiobiological evaluation of high - dose - rate interstitial brachytherapy implants.

Authors:  Than S Kehwar; Syed F Akber; Kamlesh Passi
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 3.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.