| Literature DB >> 10759560 |
E W Stawiski1, A E Baucom, S C Lohr, L M Gregoret.
Abstract
We have noted consistent structural similarities among unrelated proteases. In comparison with other proteins of similar size, proteases have smaller than average surface areas, smaller radii of gyration, and higher C(alpha) densities. These findings imply that proteases are, as a group, more tightly packed than other proteins. There are also notable differences in secondary structure content between these two groups of proteins: proteases have fewer helices and more loops. We speculate that both high packing density and low alpha-helical content coevolved in proteases to avoid autolysis. By using the structural parameters that seem to show some separation between proteases and nonproteases, a neural network has been trained to predict protease function with over 86% accuracy. Moreover, it is possible to identify proteases whose folds were not represented during training. Similar structural analyses may be useful for identifying other classes of proteins and may be of great utility for categorizing the flood of structures soon to flow from structural genomics initiatives.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2000 PMID: 10759560 PMCID: PMC18123 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.070548997
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205