Literature DB >> 10757255

Double-blind comparison of venlafaxine and amitriptyline in outpatients with major depression with or without melancholia.

V Gentil1, F Kerr-Correa, R Moreno, E D'Arrigo Busnello, J A De Campos, M F Juruena, B Lafer, D H Moreno, R L De Cassia Rodrigues, A Tiosso, E Benedictis.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine and amitriptyline in outpatients with major depression with or without melancholia. This was an 8-week, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparison of venlafaxine and amitriptyline. Outpatients with DSM-IV major depression, a minimum score of 20 on the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), and depressive symptoms for at least 1 month were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned to venlafaxine or amitriptyline, both drugs titrated to a maximum of 150 mg/day until study day 15. The primary efficacy variables were the final on-therapy scores on the HAM-D, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and Clinical Global Impression severity scales. Data were evaluated on an intent-to-treat basis using the LOCF method. One hundred and 16 patients were randomized, and 115 were evaluated for efficacy. Both drugs showed efficacy in the treatment of depression with or without melancholia. No significant differences were noted between treatments for any efficacy parameter. However, significantly (p < 0.05) more patients in the amitriptyline group had at least one adverse event. These results should support the efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine in comparison with amitriptyline for treating major depression with or without melancholia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10757255     DOI: 10.1177/026988110001400108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0269-8811            Impact factor:   4.153


  5 in total

Review 1.  Third-generation antidepressants: do they offer advantages over the SSRIs?

Authors:  J S Olver; G D Burrows; T R Norman
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.749

2.  Does study design influence outcome?. The effects of placebo control and treatment duration in antidepressant trials.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Joel R Sneed; Steven P Roose
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 17.659

3.  A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of antidepressants in Parkinson disease.

Authors:  I H Richard; M P McDermott; R Kurlan; J M Lyness; P G Como; N Pearson; S A Factor; J Juncos; C Serrano Ramos; M Brodsky; C Manning; L Marsh; L Shulman; H H Fernandez; K J Black; M Panisset; C W Christine; W Jiang; C Singer; S Horn; R Pfeiffer; D Rottenberg; J Slevin; L Elmer; D Press; H C Hyson; W McDonald
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Less is more in antidepressant clinical trials: a meta-analysis of the effect of visit frequency on treatment response and dropout.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Timothy M Cooper; Amanda Persaud; Patrick J Brown; Joel R Sneed; Steven P Roose
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.384

5.  The effect of venlafaxine compared with other antidepressants and placebo in the treatment of major depression: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael Bauer; Puvan Tharmanathan; Hans-Peter Volz; Hans-Juergen Moeller; Nick Freemantle
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.270

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.