PURPOSE: Computed tomography (CT) and, more recently, ultrasound (US), have proved excellent tools for quantifying adipose tissue distribution. Body fat distribution is an important factor in the treatment of obesity and its complications. We investigated the correlation between CT and US measurements in pediatric obesity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty obese children and adolescents aged 4.1-14.8 years were submitted to CT and US. Intra-abdominal, subcutaneous and total body fat were calculated (in cm2), with the CT image analysis software. The rectus muscle-spine and rectus muscle-aorta distances, as indicative of visceral fat thickness, were measured on US images with(out) compression. The distance between skin-fat and fat-rectus muscle interfaces was measured as subcutaneous fat thickness. We also compared US-CT findings with other morphometric variables--i.e., patient's (ideal) body weight and skin fold measures. RESULTS: At US, the rectus muscle-aorta and rectus muscle-spine distances ranged 2.4-7.5 cm (mean: 4.47 cm) and 3.6-8.9 cm (mean: 5.79 cm), respectively. The skin-rectus muscle distance ranged 1.2-7.5 cm (mean: 3.14 cm). A statistically significant correlation was found between the CT measurement of visceral fat and the aorta-rectus muscle and rectus muscle-spine distances (r = 0.80 and 0.74, respectively). The US measurements of subcutaneous fat were correlated with CT subcutaneous fat area (r = 0.82). No correlation was found between overweight, as calculated by body mass index, and CT or US fat. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that US is as useful as CT in evaluating body fat distribution in pediatric obesity.
PURPOSE: Computed tomography (CT) and, more recently, ultrasound (US), have proved excellent tools for quantifying adipose tissue distribution. Body fat distribution is an important factor in the treatment of obesity and its complications. We investigated the correlation between CT and US measurements in pediatric obesity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty obesechildren and adolescents aged 4.1-14.8 years were submitted to CT and US. Intra-abdominal, subcutaneous and total body fat were calculated (in cm2), with the CT image analysis software. The rectus muscle-spine and rectus muscle-aorta distances, as indicative of visceral fat thickness, were measured on US images with(out) compression. The distance between skin-fat and fat-rectus muscle interfaces was measured as subcutaneous fat thickness. We also compared US-CT findings with other morphometric variables--i.e., patient's (ideal) body weight and skin fold measures. RESULTS: At US, the rectus muscle-aorta and rectus muscle-spine distances ranged 2.4-7.5 cm (mean: 4.47 cm) and 3.6-8.9 cm (mean: 5.79 cm), respectively. The skin-rectus muscle distance ranged 1.2-7.5 cm (mean: 3.14 cm). A statistically significant correlation was found between the CT measurement of visceral fat and the aorta-rectus muscle and rectus muscle-spine distances (r = 0.80 and 0.74, respectively). The US measurements of subcutaneous fat were correlated with CT subcutaneous fat area (r = 0.82). No correlation was found between overweight, as calculated by body mass index, and CT or US fat. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that US is as useful as CT in evaluating body fat distribution in pediatric obesity.
Authors: Anna Prats-Puig; Sílvia Xargay-Torrent; Robert Feil; Abel López-Bermejo; Gemma Carreras-Badosa; Berta Mas-Parés; Judit Bassols; Clive J Petry; Michael Girardot; Francis D E Zegher; Lourdes Ibáñez; David B Dunger Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2019-09-25 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Annemieke M V Evelein; Frank L J Visseren; Cornelis K van der Ent; Diederick E Grobbee; Cuno S P M Uiterwaal Journal: Int J Pediatr Date: 2012-05-09