Literature DB >> 10752802

Resuscitation of critically ill patients based on the results of gastric tonometry: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

C D Gomersall1, G M Joynt, R C Freebairn, V Hung, T A Buckley, T E Oh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether additional therapy aimed at correcting low gastric intramucosal pH (pHi) improves outcome in conventionally resuscitated, critically ill patients.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled study.
SETTING: General intensive care unit (ICU) of a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 210 adult patients, with a median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of 24 (range, 8-51).
INTERVENTIONS: All patients were resuscitated according to standard guidelines. After resuscitation, those patients in the intervention group with a pHi of <7.35 were treated with additional colloid and then dobutamine (5 microg/kg/min then 10 microg/kg min) until 24 hrs after enrollment.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were no significant differences (p > .05) in ICU mortality (39.6% in the control group vs. 38.5% in the intervention group), hospital mortality (45.3% in the control group vs. 42.3% in the intervention group), and 30-day mortality (43.7% in the control group vs. 40.2 in the intervention group); survival curves; median modified maximal multiorgan dysfunction score (10 points in the control group vs. 13 points in the intervention group); median modified duration of ICU stay (12 days in the control group vs. 11.5 days in the intervention group); or median modified duration of hospital stay (60 days in the control group vs. 42 days in the intervention group). A subgroup analysis of those patients with gastric mucosal pH of > or =7.35 at admission revealed no difference in ICU mortality (10.3% in the control group vs. 14.8% in the intervention group), hospital mortality (13.8% in the control group vs. 29.6% in the intervention group), or 30-day mortality (10.3% in the control group vs. 26.9% in the intervention group).
CONCLUSIONS: The routine use of treatment titrated against pHi in the management of critically ill patients cannot be supported. Failure to improve outcome may be caused by an inability to produce a clinically significant change in pHi or because pHi is simply a marker of disease rather than a factor in the pathogenesis of multiorgan failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10752802     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200003000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  24 in total

1.  Is there a place for prostacyclin in the treatment of septic shock?

Authors:  D De Backer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Methods of monitoring shock.

Authors:  Ednan K Bajwa; Atul Malhotra; B Taylor Thompson
Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.119

Review 3.  What type of monitoring has been shown to improve outcomes in acutely ill patients?

Authors:  Gustavo A Ospina-Tascón; Ricardo L Cordioli; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-01-05       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Gastric Tonometry as a Prognostic Index of Mortality in Sepsis.

Authors:  K K Upadhyay; V P Singh; Tvsp Murthy
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

5.  Hemodynamic management of septic shock.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.725

6.  Gastric Tonometry as a Prognostic Index of Mortality in Sepsis.

Authors:  S S Jaiswal
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

Review 7.  Tissue capnometry: does the answer lie under the tongue?

Authors:  Alexandre Toledo Maciel; Jacques Creteur; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-10-02       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  Optimising organ perfusion in the high-risk surgical and critical care patient: a narrative review.

Authors:  Thomas Parker; David Brealey; Alex Dyson; Mervyn Singer
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Hemodynamic monitoring in shock and implications for management. International Consensus Conference, Paris, France, 27-28 April 2006.

Authors:  Massimo Antonelli; Mitchell Levy; Peter J D Andrews; Jean Chastre; Leonard D Hudson; Constantine Manthous; G Umberto Meduri; Rui P Moreno; Christian Putensen; Thomas Stewart; Antoni Torres
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Gastric tonometry versus cardiac index as resuscitation goals in septic shock: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Fernando Palizas; Arnaldo Dubin; Tomas Regueira; Alejandro Bruhn; Elias Knobel; Silvio Lazzeri; Natalio Baredes; Glenn Hernández
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.