Literature DB >> 10752679

The influence of infiltrating lobular carcinoma on the outcome of patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy.

G Peiro1, B A Bornstein, J L Connolly, R Gelman, S Hetelekidis, A J Nixon, A Recht, B Silver, J R Harris, S J Schnitt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of conservative surgery and radiation therapy (CS and RT) in the treatment of patients with infiltrating ductal carcinoma is well established. However, the efficacy of CS and RT for patients with infiltrating lobular carcinoma is less well documented. The goal of this study was to examine treatment outcome after CS and RT for patients with infiltrating lobular carcinoma and to compare the results to those of patients with infiltrating ductal carcinoma and patients with mixed ductal-lobular histology.
METHODS: Between 1970 and 1986, 1624 patients with Stage I or II invasive breast cancer were treated with CS and RT consisting of a complete gross excision of the tumor and > or = 6000 cGy to the primary site. Slides were available for review for 1337 of these patients (82%). Of these, 93 had infiltrating lobular carcinoma, 1089 had infiltrating ductal carcinoma, and 59 had tumors with mixed ductal and lobular features; these patients constitute the study population. The median follow-up time for surviving patients was 133 months. A comprehensive list of clinical and pathologic features was evaluated for all patients. Additional histologic features assessed for patients with infiltrating lobular carcinoma included histologic subtype, multifocal invasion, stromal desmoplasia, and the presence of signet ring cells.
RESULTS: Five and 10-year crude results by site of first failure were similar for patients with infiltrating lobular, infiltrating ductal, and mixed histology. In particular, the 10-year crude local recurrence rates were 15%, 13%, and 13% for patients with infiltrating lobular, infiltrating ductal, and mixed histology, respectively. Ten-year distant/regional recurrence rates were 22%, 23%, and 20% for the three groups, respectively. In addition, the 10-year crude contralateral breast cancer rates were 4%, 13% and 6% for patients with infiltrating lobular, infiltrating ductal and mixed histology, respectively. In a multiple regression analysis which included established prognostic factors, histologic type was not significantly associated with either survival or time to recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with infiltrating lobular carcinoma have a similar outcome following CS and RT to patients with infiltrating ductal carcinoma and to patients with tumors that have mixed ductal and lobular features. We conclude that the presence of infiltrating lobular histology should not influence decisions regarding local therapy in patients with Stage I and II breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10752679     DOI: 10.1023/a:1006384407690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  13 in total

Review 1.  Appropriate margin for lumpectomy excision of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Andrea V Barrio; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04-07

2.  Margin assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive lobular cancer.

Authors:  Jamie Wagner; Judy C Boughey; Betsy Garrett; Gildy Babiera; Henry Kuerer; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Eva Singletary; Kelly K Hunt; Lavinia P Middleton; Isabelle Bedrosian
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Comparison of mastectomy with breast-conserving surgery in invasive lobular carcinoma: 15-Year results.

Authors:  János Fodor; Tibor Major; József Tóth; Zoltán Sulyok; Csaba Polgár
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2011-07-27

4.  Accelerated partial breast irradiation using once-daily fractionation: analysis of 312 cases with four years median follow-up.

Authors:  Arif Y Shaikh; Michael A LaCombe; Hongyan Du; Vathsala T Raghavan; Ranjeev K Nanda; William D Bloomer
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Infiltrating ductal and lobular breast carcinomas are characterised by different interrelationships among markers related to angiogenesis and hormone dependence.

Authors:  D Coradini; C Pellizzaro; S Veneroni; L Ventura; M G Daidone
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-11-04       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Comparison of Clinicopathological Features and Treatment Results between Invasive Lobular Carcinoma and Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast.

Authors:  Jun Su Park; Doo Ho Choi; Seung Jae Huh; Won Park; Young Il Kim; Seok Jin Nam; Jeong Eon Lee; Won Ho Kil
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.588

7.  The clinicopathological features of second primary cancer in patients with prior breast cancer.

Authors:  YiHui Liu; ChunHui Dong; Ling Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 8.  MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature.

Authors:  Ritse M Mann; Yvonne L Hoogeveen; Johan G Blickman; Carla Boetes
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  A comparison of the clinical outcomes of patients with invasive lobular carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast according to molecular subtype in a Korean population.

Authors:  Seung Taek Lim; Jong Han Yu; Heung Kyu Park; Byung In Moon; Byung Kyun Ko; Young Jin Suh
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Outcomes of sentinel lymph node dissection alone vs. axillary lymph node dissection in early stage invasive lobular carcinoma: a retrospective study of the surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) database.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Aysegul A Sahin; Min Yi; Abigail Caudle; Kelly K Hunt; Yun Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.