Literature DB >> 10752108

Bridging the gap between science and practice in managing low back pain. A comprehensive spine care system in a health maintenance organization setting.

B J Klein1, R T Radecki, M P Foris, E I Feil, M E Hickey.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A case study of spine care system changes in a multispecialty group practice health maintenance organization setting.
OBJECTIVES: To reduce unnecessary use of imaging and specialty referrals for low back pain in the primary care setting and to reduce spine surgery rates. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Results of previous research indicate that diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for low back pain are frequently used even though there is no scientific evidence of their efficacy. This indicates that low back pain care can be made more efficient by reducing the use of unproven diagnostic and therapeutic interventions for low back pain.
METHODS: Rates of diagnostic imaging and specialty referral rates for low back pain were monitored for 9 months before and 9 months after primary care physician education regarding appropriate low back pain evaluation and management. Spine surgery rates were also monitored before and after implementation of a nonsurgical spine clinic.
RESULTS: Large reductions in rates of imaging and specialty referrals for low back pain were achieved after primary care physician education. After spine clinic implementation, visits to spine surgeons dropped by approximately 50%, and spine surgery rates per thousand health plan members were reduced by 35%.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary care physician education regarding low back pain management can reduce use of imaging and specialty referrals without reductions in patient satisfaction, and implementation of a nonsurgical spine clinic for complex or chronic spine patients can significantly reduce spine surgery consultations and spine surgery rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10752108     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200003150-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

1.  Improving spine surgical access, appropriateness and efficiency in metropolitan, urban and rural settings.

Authors:  Mohammad Zarrabian; Andrew Bidos; Caroline Fanti; Barry Young; Brian Drew; David Puskas; Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Predicting Spinal Surgery Candidacy From Imaging Data Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Bayard Wilson; Bilwaj Gaonkar; Bryan Yoo; Banafsheh Salehi; Mark Attiah; Diane Villaroman; Christine Ahn; Matthew Edwards; Azim Laiwalla; Anshul Ratnaparkhi; Ien Li; Kirstin Cook; Joel Beckett; Luke Macyszyn
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Ageism, negative attitudes, and competing co-morbidities--why older adults may not seek care for restricting back pain: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Una E Makris; Robin T Higashi; Emily G Marks; Liana Fraenkel; Joanna E M Sale; Thomas M Gill; M Carrington Reid
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.921

4.  Implementation of a Spine-Centered Care Pathway at a Regional Academic Spine Center.

Authors:  George M Ghobrial; Jefferson Wilson; Daniel Franco; Kristen Vogl; Alexander R Vaccaro; James S Harrop
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-01-06

Review 5.  What behaviour change techniques have been used to improve adherence to evidence-based low back pain imaging?

Authors:  Amanda Hall; Helen Richmond; Andrea Pike; Rebecca Lawrence; Holly Etchegary; Michelle Swab; Jacqueline Y Thompson; Charlotte Albury; Jill Hayden; Andrea M Patey; James Matthews
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 7.327

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.