Literature DB >> 10751864

Human glandular kallikrein 2: a potential serum marker for predicting the organ confined versus non-organ confined growth of prostate cancer.

A Haese1, C Becker, J Noldus, M Graefen, E Huland, H Huland, H Lilja.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We measured serum levels of human glandular kallikrein 2 (hK2) in patients with prostate cancer treated with radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer to determine whether preoperative hK2 levels discriminate stage pT2a/b from pathological stage T3a or greater cancer. This finding would help to predict preoperatively the organ confined versus non-organ confined growth of prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 68 consecutive men underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Serum was obtained 1 day preoperatively before prostatic manipulation. hK2, and total and free prostate specific antigen (PSA) were measured using immunofluorometric assays. Mean, median and range of hK2, total and free PSA, and the ratio of free-to-total PSA (percent free PSA) were calculated. Each analyte or combination of analytes was evaluated to determine whether it significantly contributed to enhance the discrimination of organ confined from non-organ confined cancer. We calculated the statistical significance of observed differences using the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Sensitivity and specificity calculations were performed for hK2, total PSA and the algorithm, (hK2) x (total PSA/free PSA) in addition to receiver operating characteristics curves and the respective areas under the curves. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was done for hK2, and total and free PSA
RESULTS: Disease was organ and non-organ (extraprostatic extension) confined in 38 and 30 men, respectively. In organ confined cancer mean hK2 was significantly lower than in non-organ confined cancer (0.09 ng./ml., range less than 0.03 to 0.23 versus 0.30, range 0.04 to 0.94, p <0.0001). In addition, there was significantly higher free and total but not percent free PSA in non-organ than in organ confined cases. There were also statistically significant differences in hK2, free PSA and total PSA at each pathological disease stage (p <0.001, <0.01 and <0.05, respectively). Sensitivity for detecting organ confined disease was 37% at 100% specificity (correct identification of all non-organ confined cancer) using hK2 measurements compared with a sensitivity of 14% for total PSA. At a specificity of 95%, sensitivity was 40% for hK2 versus 23% for total PSA, which was a statistically significant gain in sensitivity (p <0.05). Receiver operating characteristics curves demonstrated that hK2 had the largest area under the curve, followed by the algorithm, (hK2) x (total PSA/free PSA), and total PSA (0.76, 0.75 and 0.72, respectively). However, none of area under the curve differences was statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with total and free PSA hK2 testing improved the preoperative evaluation of patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy due to the superior discrimination of organ from non-organ confined cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10751864     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)67649-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  13 in total

Review 1.  The role of prostate specific antigen in screening and management of clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Khurshid Guru; Ashutosh Tewari; Ashok K Hemal; John Wei; Javid Javidan; James Peabody; Mani Menon
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Exploratory study of a KLK2 polymorphism as a prognostic marker in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Manish Kohli; Paul G Rothberg; Changyong Feng; Edward Messing; Jean Joseph; Sreevidya Sadasiva Rao; Allison Hendershot; Deepak Sahsrabudhe
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.388

3.  Simultaneous quantification of human glandular kallikrein 2 and prostate-specific antigen mRNAs in peripheral blood from prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  A Ylikoski; M Karp; K Pettersson; H Lilja; T Lövgren
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  Novel diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chikezie O Madu; Yi Lu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 5.  Screening for prostate cancer: an update.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Peter T Scardino; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.344

Review 6.  [Serum markers for early detection and staging of prostate cancer. Status report on current and future markers].

Authors:  A Haese; M Graefen; J Palisaar; E Huland; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Prostate cancer markers: An update.

Authors:  Srinivas Pentyala; Terry Whyard; Sahana Pentyala; John Muller; John Pfail; Sunjit Parmar; Carlos G Helguero; Sardar Khan
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2016-01-29

Review 8.  The Use of Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Screening and Treatment.

Authors:  Ashley V Alford; Joseph M Brito; Kamlesh K Yadav; Shalini S Yadav; Ashutosh K Tewari; Joseph Renzulli
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2017

Review 9.  Prostate-specific antigen and related isoforms in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Haese; Markus Graefen; Hartwig Huland; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Real-time quantitative RT-PCR assessment of PIM-1 and hK2 mRNA expression in benign prostate hyperplasia and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hui-chan He; Xue-cheng Bi; Zhi-wei Zheng; Qi-shan Dai; Zhao-Dong Han; Yu-Xiang Liang; Yong-Kang Ye; Guo-hua Zeng; Gang Zhu; Wei-de Zhong
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.