Literature DB >> 10751459

Breast imaging: from 1965 to the present.

E A Sickles1.   

Abstract

The current state of the art for breast imaging is reviewed in comparison with the methods of practice commonly in use 25-35 years ago to demonstrate the most important advances that have taken place in imaging techniques, operational considerations, interpretive approaches, and interventional procedures. Since 1965, breast imaging has progressed from the simple assessment of breast disease in a selected small number of symptomatic women to the comprehensive evaluation of both breast health and disease in a substantial percentage of all women aged 40 years and older. In the process, breast imaging has become an established radiologic subspecialty that accounts for at least 10% of all examinations performed by radiologists. Indeed, mammography now is the most common imaging examination that directly results in the reduction of mortality from disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10751459     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.215.1.r00ap151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  7 in total

1.  [3D ultrasound (3D US) in the diagnosis of focal breast lesions].

Authors:  D Kotsianos; S Wirth; T Fischer; K Hiltawsky; H Sittek; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Breast US computer-aided diagnosis system: robustness across urban populations in South Korea and the United States.

Authors:  Nicholas P Gruszauskas; Karen Drukker; Maryellen L Giger; Ruey-Feng Chang; Charlene A Sennett; Woo Kyung Moon; Lorenzo L Pesce
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  A review of mammographic positioning image quality criteria for the craniocaudal projection.

Authors:  Rhonda-Joy I Sweeney; Sarah J Lewis; Peter Hogg; Mark F McEntee
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Diagnosis of breast cancer based on microcalcifications using grating-based phase contrast CT.

Authors:  Xinbin Li; Hewei Gao; Zhiqiang Chen; Li Zhang; Xiaohua Zhu; Shengping Wang; Weijun Peng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Performance of breast ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis: dependence on image selection.

Authors:  Nicholas P Gruszauskas; Karen Drukker; Maryellen L Giger; Charlene A Sennett; Lorenzo L Pesce
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 6.  Comparison of standard mammography with digital mammography and digital infrared thermal imaging for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Nermin Köşüş; Aydın Köşüş; Müzeyyen Duran; Serap Simavlı; Nilgün Turhan
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2010-09-01

7.  Dedicated screening mammography for diagnosis of small breast cancer.

Authors:  Boris Kirshtein; Pavel Crystal; Michael Koretz; Selwyn Strano
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 3.352

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.