Literature DB >> 10748429

Event-related fMRI contrast when using constant interstimulus interval: theory and experiment.

P A Bandettini1, R W Cox.   

Abstract

Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (ER-fMRI) involves the mapping of averaged hemodynamic changes resulting from repeated, brief (<3 sec) brain activation episodes. In this paper, two issues regarding constant-interstimulus interval ER-fMRI were addressed. First, the optimal interstimulus interval (ISI), given a stimulus duration (SD), was determined. Second, the statistical power of ER-fMRI relative to that of a blocked-design paradigm was determined. Experimentally, it was found that with a 2-sec SD, the optimal ISI is 12 to 14 sec. Theoretically, the optimal repetition interval (T(opt) = ISI + SD) is 12 to 14 sec for stimuli of 2 sec or less. For longer stimuli, T(opt) is 8 + 2 x SD. At the optimal ISI for SD = 2 sec, the experimentally determined functional contrast of ER-fMRI was only -35% lower than that of blocked-design fMRI. Simulations that assumed a linear system demonstrated an event-related functional contrast that was -65% lower than that of the blocked design. These differences between simulated and experimental contrast suggest that the ER-fMRI amplitude is greater than that predicted by a linear shift-invariant system.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10748429     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2594(200004)43:4<540::aid-mrm8>3.0.co;2-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  50 in total

1.  Paradigm-dependent modulation of event-related fMRI activity evoked by the oddball task.

Authors:  V P Clark; S Fannon; S Lai; R Benson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Comparison of block and event-related fMRI designs in evaluating the word-frequency effect.

Authors:  Michael W L Chee; Vinod Venkatraman; Christopher Westphal; Soon Chun Siong
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  An fMRI study of the prefrontal activity during the performance of a working memory task in premutation carriers of the fragile X mental retardation 1 gene with and without fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS).

Authors:  Ryu-ichiro Hashimoto; Kristina C Backer; Flora Tassone; Randi J Hagerman; Susan M Rivera
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 4.791

Review 4.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Demand on verbal working memory delays haemodynamic response in the inferior prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Guillaume Thierry; Danielle Ibarrola; Jean-François Démonet; Dominique Cardebat
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Power spectrum ranked independent component analysis of a periodic fMRI complex motor paradigm.

Authors:  Chad H Moritz; Baxter P Rogers; M Elizabeth Meyerand
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Stimulus repetition and hemodynamic response refractoriness in event-related fMRI.

Authors:  Chun-Siong Soon; Vinod Venkatraman; Michael W L Chee
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas.

Authors:  Jody C Culham; Stacey L Danckert; Joseph F X DeSouza; Joseph S Gati; Ravi S Menon; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Prominent activation of the bilateral inferior parietal lobule of literate compared with illiterate subjects during Chinese logographic processing.

Authors:  Jinglong Wu; Xiujun Li; Jiajia Yang; Chang Cai; Hongzan Sun; Qiyong Guo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Neural correlates of pantomiming familiar and unfamiliar tools: action semantics versus mechanical problem solving?

Authors:  Guy Vingerhoets; Elisabeth Vandekerckhove; Pieterjan Honoré; Pieter Vandemaele; Eric Achten
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.