Literature DB >> 10746143

Senescent changes in scotopic contrast sensitivity.

B E Schefrin1, S J Tregear, L O Harvey, J S Werner.   

Abstract

Scotopic contrast sensitivity functions (CSFs) were measured for 50 observers between the ages of 20 and 88 years. Using a maximum-likelihood, 2-alternative, temporal forced-choice threshold-estimation algorithm, scotopic CSFs were measured at 7 spatial frequencies ranging from 0.2 to 3.0 cpd, with mean retinal illuminance equated for observers at -0.85 log scotopic Trolands. For each stimulus condition, eight cycles of a horizontal sinusoidal grating were presented within +/- 1 S.D. of a 2-D Gaussian-spatial envelope and within a 1-s Gaussian-temporal envelope. Stimuli were centered on the nasal retina along the horizontal meridian 6 degrees from the fovea. Scotopic CSFs were found to be low-pass. Statistically significant age-related declines in contrast sensitivities were found for spatial frequencies at or below 1.2 cpd. There was also a statistically significant decrease in the high frequency cut-off with age (P < 0.01). An explanation of these results in terms of optical factors is rejected, while the results are consistent with age-related changes in the magnocellular pathway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10746143     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00072-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  30 in total

1.  Senescence of the temporal impulse response to a luminous pulse.

Authors:  Keizo Shinomori; John S Werner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  Aging and vision.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  How much blue light should an IOL transmit?

Authors:  M A Mainster; J R Sparrow
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Evidence against age-related enlargements of ganglion cell receptive field centers under scotopic conditions.

Authors:  Brooke E Schefrin; Monika Hauser; John S Werner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Senescent changes in photopic spatial summation.

Authors:  Maka Malania; Frédéric Devinck; Kenneth Knoblauch; Peter B Delahunt; Joseph L Hardy; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Senescence of spatial chromatic contrast sensitivity. I. Detection under conditions controlling for optical factors.

Authors:  Joseph L Hardy; Peter B Delahunt; Katsunori Okajima; John S Werner
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Visual function in patients with yellow tinted intraocular lenses compared with vision in patients with non-tinted intraocular lenses.

Authors:  K Hayashi; H Hayashi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Scotopic spatiotemporal sensitivity differences between young and old adults.

Authors:  Cynthia L Clark; Joseph L Hardy; Vicki J Volbrecht; John S Werner
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Relationship of measures of frailty to visual function: the Beaver Dam Eye Study.

Authors:  Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; Michael D Knudtson; Kristine E Lee
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2003

Review 10.  Ultraviolet or blue-filtering intraocular lenses: what is the evidence?

Authors:  S M Downes
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.