Literature DB >> 10741786

Patient radiation exposure during coronary angiography and intervention.

S G Fransson1, J Persliden.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively register fluoroscopic and cine times in a random fashion, and to measure patient radiation exposure from routine coronary angiography and coronary balloon angioplasty. We also evaluated an optional dose reduction system used during interventions.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The incident radiation to the patient was measured as kerma area product (KAP) in Gycm(2), obtained from an ionisation chamber mounted on the undercouch tube during 65 coronary angiography procedures and another 53 percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasties (including 29 stent procedures), mostly directly following complete coronary angiography. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: The values from coronary angiography were comparable to other reports with a mean fluoroscopic time of 4.4 min and a mean KAP value of 62.6 Gycm(2). The corresponding figures from coronary balloon angioplasty without stenting were lower than otherwise reported, with 8.2 min and 47.9 Gycm(2), respectively. The use of coronary stents did prolong the mean fluoroscopic time (10.5 min) but did not significantly enhance the patient mean radiation dose (51.4 Gycm(2)). The dose reduction technique resulted in a significant KAP value reduction of 57%. In conclusion, with regard to radiation exposure, coronary angiography and balloon angioplasty are considered safe procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10741786     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0455.2000.041002142.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  9 in total

1.  Radiation dose in vertebroplasty.

Authors:  A Mehdizade; K O Lovblad; K E Wilhelm; T Somon; S G Wetzel; A D Kelekis; H Yilmaz; G Abdo; J B Martin; J M Viera; D A Rüfenacht
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2004-02-14       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Radiation exposure benefit of a lead cap in invasive cardiology.

Authors:  E Kuon; J Birkel; M Schmitt; J B Dahm
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Patient skin dose during neuroembolization by multiple-point measurement using a radiosensitive indicator.

Authors:  S Suzuki; S Furui; Y Matsumaru; S Nobuyuki; M Ebara; T Abe; D Itoh
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Evaluation of patient-absorbed doses during coronary angiography and intervention by femoral and radial artery access.

Authors:  Michael Sandborg; Sven-Göran Fransson; Håkan Pettersson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Procedural determinants of fluoroscopy time in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  Syed Fayaz Mujtaba; Tahir Saghir; Jawaid Akbar Sial; Nadeem Hassan Rizvi
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

6.  Patient radiation doses in interventional cardiology procedures.

Authors:  Ioannis Pantos; Georgios Patatoukas; Demosthenes G Katritsis; Efstathios Efstathopoulos
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2009-01

7.  Is there a gender difference in noninvasive coronary imaging? Multislice computed tomography for noninvasive detection of coronary stenoses.

Authors:  Marc Dewey; Wolfgang Rutsch; Bernd Hamm
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 2.298

8.  Transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: Impact of radiation dose.

Authors:  Roshan S Livingstone; David Chase; Anna Varghese; Paul V George; Oommen K George
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

9.  Assessment of Patient Dose with Special Look at Pediatrics during Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Mehnati P; Asghari Jafarabadi M; Danaee L
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2020-02-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.