Literature DB >> 10741365

Contact stresses with an unresurfaced patella in total knee arthroplasty: the effect of femoral component design.

S Matsuda1, T Ishinishi, L A Whiteside.   

Abstract

Compressive contact stresses between the patella and the anterior femur were measured with a digital electronic sensor before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in 10 cadaver knee specimens. Contact stresses were measured first in normal knees, then after TKA with the Insall-Burstein Total Condylar, Miller Galante II, Ortholoc II, Porous Coated Anatomic, and Profix knee prostheses implanted without resurfacing the patella. The Insall-Burstein, Miller-Galante II, and Ortholoc II prostheses had significantly higher contact stresses than the normal knee throughout the flexion arc. The Porous Coated Anatomic, which has a smooth patellar groove, maintained contact area as in the normal knee and did not have significantly higher contact stresses at flexion angles <90 degrees. At flexion angles > or =105 degrees, patellofemoral contact occurred in two small areas as the patella encountered the intercondylar notch in all components except the Profix. The Profix maintained full contact and low compressive stresses throughout the full flexion arc because of its posteriorly extended patellar groove. Design features of the patellofemoral portion of TKA components are important factors that affect contact stresses in the patellofemoral joint. These features likely will affect the clinical results of TKA with an unresurfaced patella.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10741365     DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-20000301-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  8 in total

Review 1.  [The third compartment in knee endoprosthetics: from denervation to replacement, which therapy is correct?].

Authors:  C Stärke; E F Röpke; C H Lohmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Results of total knee replacement with/without resurfacing of the patella.

Authors:  Abdul Khan; Nikhil Pradhan
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 0.513

3.  Comparison of patellar retention versus resurfacing in LCS mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bo-Hyun Hwang; Ick-Hwan Yang; Chang-Dong Han
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Revision surgery for patellofemoral problems: should we always resurface?

Authors:  Todd C Johnson; Penny J Tatman; Susan Mehle; Terence J Gioe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  [Early results of gender-specific posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty without patella resurfacing].

Authors:  P von Roth; G Matziolis; T Pfitzner; H O Mayr; T Klein; B Preininger; T Winkler; R Hube
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Technical note: the "double eye" technique as a modification of autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of retropatellar cartilage defects.

Authors:  Philipp Niemeyer; Peter C Kreuz; Matthias Steinwachs; Wolfgang Köstler; Alexander Mehlhorn; Nina Kraft; Norbert P Südkamp
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  The controversy of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: Ibisne in medio tutissimus?

Authors:  Oliver S Schindler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-08       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  A prospective evaluation of a largely cementless total knee arthroplasty cohort without patellar resurfacing: 10-year outcomes and survivorship.

Authors:  Richard J Napier; Christopher O'Neill; Seamus O'Brien; Emer Doran; Brian Mockford; Jens Boldt; David E Beverland
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.