Literature DB >> 10740164

External and middle ear effects on infant hearing screening test results.

K J Doyle1, P Rodgers, S Fujikawa, E Newman.   

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between external and middle ear factors and hearing screening results by automated auditory brain stem response (ABR) and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAEs). The ears of 200 healthy newborns aged 5 to 48 hours underwent screening by ABR and EOAE, followed by otoscopic examination. The pass rates for ABR and EOAE were 91% and 58.5%, respectively. On otoscopic examination, 28% (112/400) ears had occluding vernix obscuring the view of the tympanic membrane. Cleaning of vernix was successfully performed in all but 2 ears that had occluding vernix. Cleaning of vernix significantly increased the pass rates of all 400 ears for ABR and EOAE to 96% and 69%. Decreased tympanic membrane mobility was found in 22.7% (90/396) of ears that were evaluated otoscopically. Decreased tympanic membrane mobility had a significant effect on EOAE screening; only 33.4% of ears passed EOAE testing. Decreased tympanic membrane mobility did not significantly affect pass rates for ABR screening; 95% of these ears passed the automated ABR screen. Implications for newborn hearing screening are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10740164     DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2000.102573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  7 in total

1.  Diagnosis and Management of Congenital Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Michelle M Chen; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Pediatr       Date:  2016-07-08

2.  Sound-conduction effects on distortion-product otoacoustic emission screening outcomes in newborn infants: test performance of wideband acoustic transfer functions and 1-kHz tympanometry.

Authors:  Chris A Sanford; Douglas H Keefe; Yi-Wen Liu; Denis Fitzpatrick; Ryan W McCreery; Dawna E Lewis; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Comparison of Two-Step Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and One-Step Automated Auditory Brainstem Response for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Remote Areas of China.

Authors:  Haibin Sheng; Qian Zhou; Qixuan Wang; Yun Yu; Lihua Liu; Meie Liang; Xueyan Zhou; Hao Wu; Xiangrong Tang; Zhiwu Huang
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.418

4.  Effect of age on click-evoked otoacoustic emission: A systematic review.

Authors:  Jinfeng Liu; Ningyu Wang
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 5.135

5.  Evidence for a Right-Ear Advantage in Newborn Hearing Screening Results.

Authors:  Daphne Ari-Even Roth; Minka Hildesheimer; Ilan Roziner; Yael Henkin
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Outcomes of newborn hearing screening at an academic secondary level hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa.

Authors:  Jacqueline K Bezuidenhout; Katijah Khoza-Shangase; Tim De Maayer; Renate Strehlau
Journal:  S Afr J Commun Disord       Date:  2021-01-27

7.  Newborn hearing screening in the Limiar Clinic in Porto Velho - Rondônia.

Authors:  Marilia Silva e Nunes Botelho; Virgínia Braz da Silva; Luana da Silva Arruda; Isabel Cristiane Kuniyoshi; Lourdes Lebre Redes de Oliveira; Anderson Souza de Oliveira
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.