Literature DB >> 10738431

Cementless fixation for primary segmental bone tumor endoprostheses.

G W Blunn1, T W Briggs, S R Cannon, P S Walker, P S Unwin, S Culligan, J P Cobb.   

Abstract

To combat the high incidence of aseptic loosening for young patients and for patients with failed implants after resection for bone tumors, intramedullary cementless fixation of massive tumor implants was investigated. These implants consist of a hydroxyapatite coated titanium stem. To date, 47 of these prostheses have been inserted for the treatment of primary bone tumors. Radiographs indicate that the stems are osseointegrated. Radiolucent lines have not been seen between the implant and the bone. Bone remodeling changes have been observed. In several cases in which the implant was not seated properly on the transaction site, bone grew to the shoulder of the implant. Bone remodeling was particularly evident in stems that were coated over their entire surface. In these cases, the implant induced local bone resorption so that the bone around the midstream region became thinner, with resorption of cortical bone on the periosteal surface and maintenance of bone on the endosteal surface adjacent to the stem. This effect was attributed to stress shielding, and a three-dimensional finite element model using loading data obtained from a telemetry study indicated that, where the stem was bonded to the bone over the entire surface, stresses in the outer cortex became reduced. In the finite element model, reducing the region of hydroxyapatite coating to approximately 1/3 of the stem length reduced the extent of the low-stress area in the outer cortex. Subsequently, prostheses have been coated with hydroxyapatite over only approximately 1/3 of their stem. This method of fixing the massive endoprosthesis to the bone is thought to be successful in the short-term and offers an alternative to cemented fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10738431     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200003000-00024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  18 in total

Review 1.  Megaprostheses for the treatment of malignant bone tumours of the lower limbs.

Authors:  Christian Heisel; Stefan Kinkel; Ludger Bernd; Volker Ewerbeck
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Early distal femoral endoprosthetic survival: cemented stems versus the Compress implant.

Authors:  A A Bhangu; M J Kramer; R J Grimer; R J O'Donnell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-09-16       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Osteogenic protein-1 delivered by hydroxyapatite-coated implants improves bone ingrowth in extracortical bone bridging.

Authors:  Neil Saran; Renwen Zhang; Robert E Turcotte
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Radiographic assessment of distal femur cemented stems in tumor endoprostheses.

Authors:  R E Turcotte; N A Stavropoulos; J Toreson; M Alsultan
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-04-28

5.  Hydroxyapatite-coated collars reduce radiolucent line progression in cemented distal femoral bone tumor implants.

Authors:  Melanie J Coathup; Anish Sanghrajka; William J Aston; Panagiotis D Gikas; Robin C Pollock; Stephen R Cannon; John A Skinner; Timothy W R Briggs; Gordon W Blunn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Intercalary femur allografts are an acceptable alternative after tumor resection.

Authors:  Luis Aponte-Tinao; Germán L Farfalli; Lucas E Ritacco; Miguel A Ayerza; D Luis Muscolo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Endoprosthetic replacement of diaphyseal bone defects. Long-term results.

Authors:  E Aldlyami; A Abudu; R J Grimer; S R Carter; R M Tillman
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  What are the 5-year survivorship outcomes of compressive endoprosthetic osseointegration fixation of the femur?

Authors:  Michael J Monument; Nicholas M Bernthal; Austin J Bowles; Kevin B Jones; R Lor Randall
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Compressive osseointegration of tibial implants in primary cancer reconstruction.

Authors:  Richard J O'Donnell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Osteointegration of hydroxyapatite-coated collars in cemented massive endoprostheses following revision surgery.

Authors:  Benjamin Davies; Rajiv Kaila; Loukas Andritsos; Christian Gray Stephens; Gordon W Blunn; Craig Gerrand; Panagiotis Gikas; Andrew Johnston
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2021-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.