Literature DB >> 24942962

What are the 5-year survivorship outcomes of compressive endoprosthetic osseointegration fixation of the femur?

Michael J Monument1, Nicholas M Bernthal, Austin J Bowles, Kevin B Jones, R Lor Randall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aseptic complications such as stress shielding leading to bone loss are major problems associated with revision of cemented and uncemented long-stem tumor endoprostheses. Endoprosthetic reconstruction using compressive osseointegration fixation is a relatively new limb salvage technology designed to enhance osseointegration, prevent stress shielding, and provide fixation for short end-segments. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the survivorship of this technique at minimum 5-year followup? (2) Were patient factors (age, sex, body mass index), oncological factors, or anatomic locations associated with implant failure? (3) Were there any prosthesis-related variables associated with failure?
METHODS: A single-center, retrospective review of patients with a minimum 5-year followup (mean, 8 years; range, 5-12 years) treated with an osseointegration compressive device for endoprosthetic fixation of proximal and distal femoral limb salvage reconstructions was performed. We have previously published the implant survivorship of this patient cohort with a minimum 2-year followup and are now reporting on the 5-year survivorship data. From 2002 to 2008, we performed 22 such procedures in 22 patients. Four patients died of their disease within 5 years of surgery and all surviving patients (n = 18) had complete followup data at a minimum of 5 years. General indications for this device during that time were pediatric and adult patients requiring primary endoprosthetic reconstructions of the proximal or distal femur for benign and malignant bone lesions. The primary outcome was reoperations for mechanical (aseptic) failures. Secondary outcomes included implant removal for nonmechanical failures and any patient-, oncological-, or implant-related variables associated with implant removal.
RESULTS: At a minimum of 5 years followup, overall mechanical (aseptic) implant survivorship was 16 of 18. Survivorship for all modes of failure (oncological failure, infection, arthrofibrosis, and mechanical failure) was 12 of 18. All mechanical failures occurred early, within the first 30 months. We identified no patient-, oncological-, or implant-related features predictive of failure.
CONCLUSIONS: Our intermediate-term experience with compressive osseointegration fixation for endoprosthetic limb reconstructions demonstrates with longer clinical followup, no additional mechanical failures were observed as compared with our early analysis. Our experience with this fixation at a minimum of 5-years followup adds to a very limited but increasing body of literature demonstrating that after a transient period of increased risk for implant failures, survivorship stabilizes. Assessment of this fixation strategy beyond 10 years of clinical followup is needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24942962      PMCID: PMC4317431          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3724-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  24 in total

1.  Endoprosthetic replacement of the distal femur for bone tumours: long-term results.

Authors:  G J C Myers; A T Abudu; S R Carter; R M Tillman; R J Grimer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-04

2.  Etiology and results of tumor endoprosthesis revision surgery in 64 patients.

Authors:  P Z Wirganowicz; J J Eckardt; F J Dorey; F R Eilber; J M Kabo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  In vitro testing of a novel limb salvage prosthesis for the distal femur.

Authors:  Luca Cristofolini; Stefano Bini; Aldo Toni
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Revision of the Kotz type of tumour endoprosthesis for the lower limb.

Authors:  F Mittermayer; R Windhager; M Dominkus; P Krepler; E Schwameis; M Sluga; R Kotz; G Strasser
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-04

Review 5.  Wolff's Law and bone's structural adaptations to mechanical usage: an overview for clinicians.

Authors:  H M Frost
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 6.  Failure mode classification for tumor endoprostheses: retrospective review of five institutions and a literature review.

Authors:  Eric R Henderson; John S Groundland; Elisa Pala; Jeremy A Dennis; Rebecca Wooten; David Cheong; Reinhard Windhager; Rainer I Kotz; Mario Mercuri; Philipp T Funovics; Francis J Hornicek; H Thomas Temple; Pietro Ruggieri; G Douglas Letson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Aseptic failure: how does the Compress(®) implant compare to cemented stems?

Authors:  Andrew C Pedtke; Rosanna L Wustrack; Andrew S Fang; Robert J Grimer; Richard J O'Donnell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Expandable endoprosthesis reconstruction in skeletally immature patients with tumors.

Authors:  J J Eckardt; J M Kabo; C M Kelley; W G Ward; A Asavamongkolkul; P Z Wirganowicz; R S Yang; F R Eilber
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Effect of chemotherapy on initial compressive osseointegration of tumor endoprostheses.

Authors:  R S Avedian; R E Goldsby; M J Kramer; R J O'Donnell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Cemented distal femoral endoprostheses for musculoskeletal tumor: improved survival of modular versus custom implants.

Authors:  Adam J Schwartz; J Michael Kabo; Fritz C Eilber; Frederick R Eilber; Jeffrey J Eckardt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  13 in total

1.  Use of Compressive Osseointegration Endoprostheses for Massive Bone Loss From Tumor and Failed Arthroplasty: A Viable Option in the Upper Extremity.

Authors:  Krista A Goulding; Adam Schwartz; Steven J Hattrup; R Lor Randall; Donald Lee; Damian M Rispoli; Daniel M Lerman; Christopher Beauchamp
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  How Often Does Spindle Failure Occur in Compressive Osseointegration Endoprostheses for Oncologic Reconstruction?

Authors:  Lauren H Goldman; Lee J Morse; Richard J O'Donnell; Rosanna L Wustrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  What Factors Are Associated With Failure of Compressive Osseointegration Fixation?

Authors:  Ryland Kagan; Jacob Adams; Caroline Schulman; Rachel Laursen; Karina Espana; Jung Yoo; Yee-Cheen Doung; James Hayden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Chemotherapy Curtails Bone Formation From Compliant Compression Fixation of Distal Femoral Endoprostheses.

Authors:  Mohammad A Elalfy; Patrick J Boland; John H Healey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  CORR Insights(®): How Often Does Spindle Failure Occur in Compressive Osseointegration Endoprostheses for Oncologic Reconstruction?

Authors:  Miguel A Ayerza
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Revision Distal Femoral Arthroplasty With the Compress(®) Prosthesis Has a Low Rate of Mechanical Failure at 10 Years.

Authors:  Melissa N Zimel; German L Farfalli; Alexandra M Zindman; Elyn R Riedel; Carol D Morris; Patrick J Boland; John H Healey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  The Compress® transcutaneous implant for rehabilitation following limb amputation.

Authors:  R L McGough; M A Goodman; R L Randall; J A Forsberg; B K Potter; B Lindsey
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  What Are the Long-term Surgical Outcomes of Compressive Endoprosthetic Osseointegration of the Femur with a Minimum 10-year Follow-up Period?

Authors:  John Groundland; Jeffrey M Brown; Michael Monument; Nicholas Bernthal; Kevin B Jones; R Lor Randall
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  CORR Insights®: Compliant Compression Reconstruction of the Proximal Femur Is Durable Despite Minimal Bone Formation in the Compression Segment.

Authors:  Michelle Ghert
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.755

10.  What Is the Survival of the Telescope Allograft Technique to Augment a Short Proximal Femur Segment in Children After Resection and Distal Femur Endoprosthesis Reconstruction for a Bone Sarcoma?

Authors:  Suraj Hindiskere; Eric Staals; Davide Maria Donati; Marco Manfrini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 4.755

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.