Literature DB >> 10738323

Custom cranioplasty using stereolithography and acrylic.

P S D'Urso1, W J Earwaker, T M Barker, M J Redmond, R G Thompson, D J Effeney, F H Tomlinson.   

Abstract

Numerous methods of cranioplasty have been described. Customization and prefabrication have been reported to reduce operating time and improve cosmesis. An original technique for the manufacture of customized cranioplastic implants has been developed and tested in 30 patients.Thirty patients requiring cranioplasties were selected. Data acquired from computed tomography (CT) were used to manufacture exact plastic replicas (biomodels) of craniotomy defects and master cranioplastic implants using the rapid prototyping technology of stereolithography (SL). The three-dimensional (3D) imaging techniques of mirroring and interpolation were used to extrapolate on existing anatomy to design the master implants. The master implants were hand finished to fit the defect in the corresponding cranial biomodel exactly and were then used to create a cavity mould. The mould was used to cast thermally polymerised custom acrylic implants. The surgeons reported that the customized implants reduced operating time, afforded excellent cosmesis and were cost effective. The patients reported that the opportunity to see the biomodel and implant preoperatively improved their understanding of the procedure. Two complications were noted, one infection and one implant required significant trimming. The simultaneous manufacture of the master implant (male) and biomodel (female) components from SL allowed custom accurate implants to be manufactured. Disadvantages identified were the time required for computer manipulations of the CT data (up to 2 h), difficulty in assessing the accuracy of the computer generated master as a 3D rendering, the potential for SL parts to warp, manufacturing time (minimum 2 days) and the cost of approximately $1300 US per case ($1000 for the SL biomodel and $300 for the acrylic casting). Copyright 2000 The British Association of Plastic Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10738323     DOI: 10.1054/bjps.1999.3268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Plast Surg        ISSN: 0007-1226


  39 in total

1.  3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications.

Authors:  F Rengier; A Mehndiratta; H von Tengg-Kobligk; C M Zechmann; R Unterhinninghofen; H-U Kauczor; F L Giesel
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 2.  Stereolithographic bone scaffold design parameters: osteogenic differentiation and signal expression.

Authors:  Kyobum Kim; Andrew Yeatts; David Dean; John P Fisher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 3.  Medical 3D Printing for the Radiologist.

Authors:  Dimitris Mitsouras; Peter Liacouras; Amir Imanzadeh; Andreas A Giannopoulos; Tianrun Cai; Kanako K Kumamaru; Elizabeth George; Nicole Wake; Edward J Caterson; Bohdan Pomahac; Vincent B Ho; Gerald T Grant; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Applications of three-dimensional printing technology in the cardiovascular field.

Authors:  Di Shi; Kai Liu; Xin Zhang; Hang Liao; Xiaoping Chen
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 5.  Stereolithography in tissue engineering.

Authors:  Shelby A Skoog; Peter L Goering; Roger J Narayan
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 6.  Current Concepts in Restoring Acquired Cranial Defects.

Authors:  K V Arun Kumar; N K Singla; Mahesh E Gowda; Dinesh Kumar; V S Legha
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2014-06-05

Review 7.  Calvarial Reconstruction.

Authors:  Arvind Badhey; Sameep Kadakia; Moustafa Mourad; Jared Inman; Yadranko Ducic
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.314

8.  Laser direct writing of micro- and nano-scale medical devices.

Authors:  Shaun D Gittard; Roger J Narayan
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.166

9.  Using three-dimensional multigrid-based snake and multiresolution image registration for reconstruction of cranial defect.

Authors:  Yuan-Lin Liao; Chia-Feng Lu; Chieh-Tsai Wu; Jiann-Der Lee; Shih-Tseng Lee; Yung-Nien Sun; Yu-Te Wu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Customized cranioplasty implants using three-dimensional printers and polymethyl-methacrylate casting.

Authors:  Bum-Joon Kim; Ki-Sun Hong; Kyung-Jae Park; Dong-Hyuk Park; Yong-Gu Chung; Shin-Hyuk Kang
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.