Literature DB >> 10737395

Completeness of cancer registration: a new method for routine use.

J Bullard1, M P Coleman, D Robinson, J M Lutz, J Bell, J Peto.   

Abstract

We report a new method of estimating the completeness of cancer registration, in which the proportions of unregistered patients are derived from the time distributions of three probabilities, each of which can be directly estimated from the registry's own data--the probabilities of survival, of registration of the cancer during the patient's life, and of the mention of cancer on the death certificate of a cancer patient who dies. This method allows completeness to be assessed routinely by factors such as age, sex, geographical area and tumour type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10737395      PMCID: PMC2374436          DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.1999.1048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  17 in total

1.  Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival.

Authors:  S J CUTLER; F EDERER
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1958-12

2.  An application of capture-recapture methods to the estimation of completeness of cancer registration.

Authors:  S C Robles; L D Marrett; E A Clarke; H A Risch
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Completeness of registration of childhood leukaemia near nuclear installations and elsewhere in the Oxford region.

Authors:  G J Draper; B D Bower; S C Darby; R Doll
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-10-14

4.  A novel method of assessing completeness of tumor registration.

Authors:  R M Heiberger; C L Miller; P Feigl; W W Lane; G Glaefke
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  The capture-recapture method for estimation of cancer registry completeness: a useful tool?

Authors:  L J Schouten; H Straatman; L A Kiemeney; C H Gimbrère; A L Verbeek
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Undernotification of diagnosed cancer cases to the Stockholm Cancer Registry.

Authors:  B Mattsson; L E Rutqvist; A Wallgren
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Variations in the level of reporting by hospitals to a regional cancer registry.

Authors:  L S Freedman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  The completeness of cancer registration in England: an assessment from the Oxford-FPA contraceptive study.

Authors:  L Villard-Mackintosh; M P Coleman; M P Vessey
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Limitations of the death certificate only index as a measure of incompleteness of cancer registration.

Authors:  H Brenner
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Incompleteness of oral cancer registration in south-east England, 1971-87.

Authors:  K A Warnakulasuriya; P Acworth; J Bell; N W Johnson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  16 in total

1.  Comparing survival rates between different registries can be difficult.

Authors:  D Robinson; J Bell; H Møller
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-11-11

2.  The survival of patients with high grade glioma from different ethnic groups in South East England.

Authors:  T Ratneswaren; R M Jack; D Tataru; E A Davies
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Are UK cancer cure rates worse than in most other European countries?

Authors:  Robert Souhami
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Completeness of case ascertainment at the Irish National Cancer Registry.

Authors:  K O'Brien; H Comber; L Sharp
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Survival differences between European and US patients with colorectal cancer: role of stage at diagnosis and surgery.

Authors:  L Ciccolallo; R Capocaccia; M P Coleman; F Berrino; J W W Coebergh; R A M Damhuis; J Faivre; C Martinez-Garcia; H Møller; M Ponz de Leon; G Launoy; N Raverdy; E M I Williams; G Gatta
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Update of predictions of mortality from pleural mesothelioma in the Netherlands.

Authors:  O Segura; A Burdorf; C Looman
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Factors predicting hospital length-of-stay and readmission after colorectal resection: a population-based study of elective and emergency admissions.

Authors:  Maria Kelly; Linda Sharp; Fiona Dwane; Tracy Kelleher; Harry Comber
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Completeness of case ascertainment and survival time error in English cancer registries: impact on 1-year survival estimates.

Authors:  H Møller; S Richards; N Hanchett; S P Riaz; M Lüchtenborg; L Holmberg; D Robinson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  A visual summary of the EUROCARE-4 results: a UK perspective.

Authors:  H Møller; K M Linklater; D Robinson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  A comprehensive assessment of the impact of errors in the cancer registration process on 1- and 5-year relative survival estimates.

Authors:  M J Rutherford; H Møller; P C Lambert
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.