Literature DB >> 10737166

On-line haemodiafiltration versus low-flux haemodialysis. A prospective randomized study.

V Wizemann1, C Lotz, F Techert, S Uthoff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current methods of renal replacement therapy lead only to an insignificant removal of larger, potentially toxic, substances, which are excreted by healthy kidneys. On-line preparation of substituate from dialysate and the use of high-flux membranes allow substantial convective removal of such substances. A modified on-line haemodiafiltration method with the use of a large membrane surface and a high convective part was chosen to test whether the elimination of larger substances, such as low-molecular-mass proteins, has a clinical impact.
METHODS: In a prospective, controlled study over 24 months, 44 unselected chronic dialysis patients were randomized to undergo either low-flux haemodialysis (HD; n = 21) or haemodiafiltration (HDF; n = 23). To eliminate confounding factors, low-molecular efficacy was matched (Kt/V 1.8), and the same membrane material (polysulfone), ultrapure dialysate and the same treatment duration (4.5 h) were applied to each group.
RESULTS: Morbidity, mortality, blood pressure, dialysis-associated hypotensive episodes, haematocrit and erythropoietin dose did not differ between the groups. The same was true for body weight and, accordingly, bioimpedance values, clinical hydration score, skinfold thickness, plasma albumin, prealbumin and transferrin. beta2-Microglobulin in the plasma did not change in the HD group and varied between 32 and 43 mg/l throughout the 2 years. In HDF, beta2 microglobulin decreased from similar values to 18 mg/l predialysis (P<0.01) in the first 6 months of HDF treatment and then remained constant during the remaining 18 months.
CONCLUSION: In the absence of any clinical marker of uraemic toxicity the removal of larger molecules over the time-span of 2 years during HDF had no clinical implication compared with extremely (and for routine practice unrealistically) well-dialysed patients with low-flux HD. In the absence of any side-effects of on-line HDF and supposing that plasma beta2-microglobulin is a marker of morbidity, on-line HDF ensures an excellent dialysis quality which apparently takes time to translate into measurable clinical sequelae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10737166     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.ndt.a027963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  14 in total

1.  High-efficiency postdilution online hemodiafiltration reduces all-cause mortality in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Francisco Maduell; Francesc Moreso; Mercedes Pons; Rosa Ramos; Josep Mora-Macià; Jordi Carreras; Jordi Soler; Ferran Torres; Josep M Campistol; Alberto Martinez-Castelao
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Survival of incident patients on high-volume online hemodiafiltration compared to low-volume online hemodiafiltration and high-flux hemodialysis.

Authors:  Goran Imamović; Rajko Hrvačević; Sonja Kapun; Daniele Marcelli; Inga Bayh; Aileen Grassmann; Laura Scatizzi; Jelena Maslovarić; Bernard Canaud
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Role of residual kidney function and convective volume on change in beta2-microglobulin levels in hemodiafiltration patients.

Authors:  E Lars Penne; Neelke C van der Weerd; Peter J Blankestijn; Marinus A van den Dorpel; Muriel P C Grooteman; Menso J Nubé; Piet M Ter Wee; Renée Lévesque; Michiel L Bots
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Treatment of hepatic encephalopathy by on-line hemodiafiltration: a case series study.

Authors:  Shinju Arata; Katsuaki Tanaka; Kazuhisa Takayama; Yoshihiro Moriwaki; Noriyuki Suzuki; Mitsugi Sugiyama; Kazuo Aoyagi
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2010-05-21

5.  Technical breakthroughs in the wearable artificial kidney (WAK).

Authors:  Victor Gura; Alexandra S Macy; Masoud Beizai; Carlos Ezon; Thomas A Golper
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Long-term outcomes in online hemodiafiltration and high-flux hemodialysis: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Enric Vilar; Andrew C Fry; David Wellsted; James E Tattersall; Roger N Greenwood; Ken Farrington
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Predictors of haemoglobin levels and resistance to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients treated with low-flux haemodialysis, haemofiltration and haemodiafiltration: results of a multicentre randomized and controlled trial.

Authors:  Francesco Locatelli; Paolo Altieri; Simeone Andrulli; Giovanna Sau; Piergiorgio Bolasco; Luciano A Pedrini; Carlo Basile; Salvatore David; Mariano Feriani; Pier Eugenio Nebiolo; Rocco Ferrara; Domenica Casu; Francesco Logias; Renzo Tarchini; Francesco Cadinu; Mario Passaghe; Gianfranco Fundoni; Giuseppe Villa; Biagio Raffaele Di Iorio; Carmine Zoccali
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 5.992

8.  Effect of increased convective clearance by on-line hemodiafiltration on all cause and cardiovascular mortality in chronic hemodialysis patients - the Dutch CONvective TRAnsport STudy (CONTRAST): rationale and design of a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN38365125].

Authors:  E Lars Penne; Peter J Blankestijn; Michiel L Bots; Marinus A van den Dorpel; Muriel P Grooteman; Menso J Nubé; Ingeborg van der Tweel; Piet M Ter Wee
Journal:  Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2005-05-20

Review 9.  Does delivering more dialysis improve clinical outcomes? What randomized controlled trials have shown.

Authors:  Javier Deira; Mariana Murea; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Francesco Gaetano Casino; Carlo Basile
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.393

10.  Comparison of toxin removal outcomes in online hemodiafiltration and intra-dialytic exercise in high-flux hemodialysis: a prospective randomized open-label clinical study protocol.

Authors:  Vaibhav Maheshwari; Lakshminarayanan Samavedham; Gade Pandu Rangaiah; Yijun Loy; Lieng Hsi Ling; Sunil Sethi; Titus Lau Wai Leong
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 2.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.