K R Thulborn1, C Martin, J T Voyvodic. 1. Department of Radiology, MR Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Alzheimer's disease is associated with progressive visuospatial dysfunction. This study used functional MR (fMR) imaging with an eye movement paradigm to investigate differences in visuospatial cognition between patients with probable Alzheimer's disease (pAD) and cognitively able elderly volunteers. METHODS: Using established, although imperfect, clinical criteria, patients with pAD (n = 18) and cognitively able elderly volunteers (n = 10) were selected for study. All patients underwent echo-planar fMR imaging at 1.5 T. The visually guided saccade paradigm consisted of alternating periods (30 s) of central fixation and visually guided saccades to a target appearing randomly along the horizontal meridian. Activation maps were derived using a voxelwise t test, comparing the signal intensities between the two steady-state conditions. The activation patterns were characterized by Talairach coordinates, activation volumes, and laterality ratios (LRs). RESULTS: Statistically significant differences existed between the activation patterns of the patients with pAD and those of the volunteers. In contrast to the control group, a left-dominant parietal activation pattern and enhanced prefrontal cortical activation were observed in most patients with pAD. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of the imperfect clinical standard of reference, the reduction in right parietal activation producing the left-dominant LR for the intraparietal sulcus may reflect the progressive dysfunction in spatial attention associated with Alzheimer's disease, considering the known parietal lobe involvement in this function and the disease. The high specificity of a positive intraparietal sulcal LR measured by fMR imaging may have a role in detecting and monitoring Alzheimer's disease.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Alzheimer's disease is associated with progressive visuospatial dysfunction. This study used functional MR (fMR) imaging with an eye movement paradigm to investigate differences in visuospatial cognition between patients with probable Alzheimer's disease (pAD) and cognitively able elderly volunteers. METHODS: Using established, although imperfect, clinical criteria, patients with pAD (n = 18) and cognitively able elderly volunteers (n = 10) were selected for study. All patients underwent echo-planar fMR imaging at 1.5 T. The visually guided saccade paradigm consisted of alternating periods (30 s) of central fixation and visually guided saccades to a target appearing randomly along the horizontal meridian. Activation maps were derived using a voxelwise t test, comparing the signal intensities between the two steady-state conditions. The activation patterns were characterized by Talairach coordinates, activation volumes, and laterality ratios (LRs). RESULTS: Statistically significant differences existed between the activation patterns of the patients with pAD and those of the volunteers. In contrast to the control group, a left-dominant parietal activation pattern and enhanced prefrontal cortical activation were observed in most patients with pAD. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of the imperfect clinical standard of reference, the reduction in right parietal activation producing the left-dominant LR for the intraparietal sulcus may reflect the progressive dysfunction in spatial attention associated with Alzheimer's disease, considering the known parietal lobe involvement in this function and the disease. The high specificity of a positive intraparietal sulcal LR measured by fMR imaging may have a role in detecting and monitoring Alzheimer's disease.
Authors: B Horwitz; A R McIntosh; J V Haxby; M Furey; J A Salerno; M B Schapiro; S I Rapoport; C L Grady Journal: Neuroreport Date: 1995-11-27 Impact factor: 1.837
Authors: B Luna; K R Thulborn; M H Strojwas; B J McCurtain; R A Berman; C R Genovese; J A Sweeney Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 1998 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: M J Mentis; B Horwitz; C L Grady; G E Alexander; J W VanMeter; J M Maisog; P Pietrini; M B Schapiro; S I Rapoport Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1996-01 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Tilo Kircher; Renate Thienel; Michael Wagner; Martina Reske; Ute Habel; Thilo Kellermann; Ingo Frommann; Sibylle Schwab; Wolfgang Wölwer; Martina von Wilmsdorf; Dieter F Braus; Andrea Schmitt; Alexander Rapp; Tony Stöcker; N Jon Shah; Fritz A Henn; Heinrich Sauer; Wolfgang Gaebel; Wolfgang Maier; Frank Schneider Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2008-09-19 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: Caterina Rosano; Howard J Aizenstein; Jennifer L Cochran; Judith A Saxton; Steven T De Kosky; Anne B Newman; Lewis H Kuller; Oscar L Lopez; Cameron S Carter Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2005-04-01 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Susanne G Mueller; Michael W Weiner; Leon J Thal; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; John Q Trojanowski; Arthur W Toga; Laurel Beckett Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: M M Machulda; H A Ward; B Borowski; J L Gunter; R H Cha; P C O'Brien; R C Petersen; B F Boeve; D Knopman; D F Tang-Wai; R J Ivnik; G E Smith; E G Tangalos; C R Jack Journal: Neurology Date: 2003-08-26 Impact factor: 9.910