Literature DB >> 10730637

Prognostic factors in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma treated with selective intra-arterial chemotherapy.

K L Chow1, Y P Gobin, T Cloughesy, J W Sayre, J P Villablanca, F Viñuela.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Factors predictive of primary brain tumor outcome have been studied extensively, although the prognostic value of radiologic data, such as MR imaging and angiographic characteristics, has not been studied in depth. The purpose of this study was to determine whether radiologic data were prognostic factors among patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma treated with selective intra-arterial chemotherapy.
METHODS: Forty-six patients were enrolled in a Phase II study of intra-arterial chemotherapy with carboplatin and Cereport (Alkermes Inc.; Cambridge, MA), a bradykinin analog that selectively increases permeability of the blood-tumor barrier. MR imaging volumes of enhancing tumor, resection cavity, and T2 signal abnormality were measured with T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences. Volumes were analyzed individually and in various combinations. Tumor vascularity was graded on angiograms. Outcome was measured by time to tumor progression and survival.
RESULTS: Of 46 patients included in this study, 41 underwent evaluation. Thirty were male and 11 were female; mean age was 48.5 years. Karnofsky scores ranged from 70 to 100. Thirty-two patients had glioblastoma multiforme, whereas nine had anaplastic astrocytoma. Twenty-eight patients had tumor progression and 13 had stable disease. Twenty-three patients died after an average of 205 days; 18 were surviving at an average of 324 days from the start of intra-arterial chemotherapy. In multivariate analysis, time from diagnosis to intra-arterial chemotherapy was predictive both of time to tumor progression and survival. Net tumor volume and vascularity also were significant for survival. Age, Karnofsky performance status, histologic findings, gender, MR imaging area, resection cavity volume, T2 signal abnormality volume, and various combined volumes were not significant.
CONCLUSION: If confirmed by further studies, radiologic factors such as tumor volume and angiographic vascularity should be considered in design and stratification of future chemotherapy trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10730637      PMCID: PMC8174969     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  43 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of lesion size for glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  G I Reeves; J E Marks
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications.

Authors:  J Folkman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1971-11-18       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Prognostic factors for high-grade malignant glioma: development of a prognostic index. A Report of the Medical Research Council Brain Tumour Working Party.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Correlation of basic fibroblast growth factor expression levels with the degree of malignancy and vascularity in human gliomas.

Authors:  J A Takahashi; M Fukumoto; K Igarashi; Y Oda; H Kikuchi; M Hatanaka
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Survival in glioblastoma: historical perspective.

Authors:  M Salcman
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Regional heterogeneity in the proliferative activity of human gliomas as measured by the Ki-67 labeling index.

Authors:  S W Coons; P C Johnson
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.685

7.  Microvascular architecture in a mammary carcinoma: branching patterns and vessel dimensions.

Authors:  J R Less; T C Skalak; E M Sevick; R K Jain
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-01-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Brain cancer incidence, mortality and case survival: observations from two Australian cancer registries.

Authors:  D Shugg; B J Allen; L Blizzard; T Dwyer; D Roder
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1994-12-15       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Combined intra-arterial and systemic chemotherapy for recurrent malignant brain tumors.

Authors:  K Watne; E Hannisdal; O Nome; B Hager; H Hirschberg
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Evaluating glioma therapies: modeling treatments and predicting outcomes.

Authors:  S Kirby; M Brothers; W Irish; R Florell; D Macdonald; C Schold; G Cairncross
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  16 in total

1.  Estimation of tumor volume with fuzzy-connectedness segmentation of MR images.

Authors:  Gul Moonis; Jianguo Liu; Jayaram K Udupa; David B Hackney
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Consensus recommendations for a standardized Brain Tumor Imaging Protocol in clinical trials.

Authors:  Benjamin M Ellingson; Martin Bendszus; Jerrold Boxerman; Daniel Barboriak; Bradley J Erickson; Marion Smits; Sarah J Nelson; Elizabeth Gerstner; Brian Alexander; Gregory Goldmacher; Wolfgang Wick; Michael Vogelbaum; Michael Weller; Evanthia Galanis; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Lalitha Shankar; Paula Jacobs; Whitney B Pope; Dewen Yang; Caroline Chung; Michael V Knopp; Soonme Cha; Martin J van den Bent; Susan Chang; W K Al Yung; Timothy F Cloughesy; Patrick Y Wen; Mark R Gilbert
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 3.  A review of the automated detection of change in serial imaging studies of the brain.

Authors:  Julia Patriarche; Bradley Erickson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-06-29       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Measurement of tumor "size" in recurrent malignant glioma: 1D, 2D, or 3D?

Authors:  Mary F Dempsey; Barrie R Condon; Donald M Hadley
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Super selective intra-arterial cerebral infusion of modern chemotherapeutics after blood-brain barrier disruption: where are we now, and where we are going.

Authors:  Randy S D'Amico; Deepak Khatri; Noah Reichman; Nitesh V Patel; Tamika Wong; Sherese R Fralin; Mona Li; Jason A Ellis; Rafael Ortiz; David J Langer; John A Boockvar
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 6.  Intraarterial drug delivery for glioblastoma mutiforme: Will the phoenix rise again?

Authors:  Shailendra Joshi; Jason A Ellis; Eugene Ornstein; Jeffrey N Bruce
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Fuzzy rules to predict degree of malignancy in brain glioma.

Authors:  C Z Ye; J Yang; D Y Geng; Y Zhou; N Y Chen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 8.  Molecular imaging in cancer treatment.

Authors:  Mark H Michalski; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Bevacizumab at first recurrence after standard radio-chemotherapy is associated with improved overall survival in glioblastoma patients with large tumor burden.

Authors:  Huy Tram Nguyen; Nhung Nguyen; Liang Yen Liu; Laura Dovek; Daniel Lenchner; Robert Harris; Byram Ozer; Arliene Ravelo; Nicolas Sommer; Myung Shin Sim; Robert Elashoff; Richard Green; Phioanh Leia Nghiemphu; Timothy Francis Cloughesy; Benjamin Ellingson; Albert Lai
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2018-09-20

Review 10.  The role of targeted therapies in the management of progressive glioblastoma : a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Olson; Lakshmi Nayak; D Ryan Ormond; Patrick Y Wen; Steven N Kalkanis; Timothy Charles Ryken
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.