BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Reproducible measurements of brain tumor volume are helpful in evaluating the response to therapy and the need for changing treatment plans. Our purpose was to adapt the fuzzy-connectedness segmentation technique to measure tumor volume. This technique requires only limited operator interaction. METHODS: Routine postoperative brain MR imaging was performed in 19 patients with primary malignant gliomas of the brain. Segmentation was performed on axial and coronal gadolinium-enhanced and axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images by using a fuzzy-connectedness algorithm, and tumor volumes were generated. Operator interaction was limited to selecting representative seed points within the tumor and, if necessary, editing the segmented image to include or exclude improperly classified regions. RESULTS: Measurements of tumor volume were highly reproducible when they were obtained with no editing; intraobserver coefficients of variation were 0.15-0.37% and 0.29-0.38%, respectively, for enhanced images and FLAIR images. Editing consistently produced smaller volumes, at the cost of greater variability in volume measurements. Coefficients of variation for volumes with editing ranged from 0.2% to 1.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Fuzzy-connected segmentation permits rapid, reliable, consistent and highly reproducible measurement of tumor volume from MR images with limited operator interaction.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Reproducible measurements of brain tumor volume are helpful in evaluating the response to therapy and the need for changing treatment plans. Our purpose was to adapt the fuzzy-connectedness segmentation technique to measure tumor volume. This technique requires only limited operator interaction. METHODS: Routine postoperative brain MR imaging was performed in 19 patients with primary malignant gliomas of the brain. Segmentation was performed on axial and coronal gadolinium-enhanced and axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images by using a fuzzy-connectedness algorithm, and tumor volumes were generated. Operator interaction was limited to selecting representative seed points within the tumor and, if necessary, editing the segmented image to include or exclude improperly classified regions. RESULTS: Measurements of tumor volume were highly reproducible when they were obtained with no editing; intraobserver coefficients of variation were 0.15-0.37% and 0.29-0.38%, respectively, for enhanced images and FLAIR images. Editing consistently produced smaller volumes, at the cost of greater variability in volume measurements. Coefficients of variation for volumes with editing ranged from 0.2% to 1.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Fuzzy-connected segmentation permits rapid, reliable, consistent and highly reproducible measurement of tumor volume from MR images with limited operator interaction.
Authors: M Vaidyanathan; L P Clarke; L O Hall; C Heidtman; R Velthuizen; K Gosche; S Phuphanich; H Wagner; H Greenberg; M L Silbiger Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1997 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: L P Clarke; R P Velthuizen; M Clark; J Gaviria; L Hall; D Goldgof; R Murtagh; S Phuphanich; S Brem Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1998-04 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: P K Sneed; P H Gutin; D A Larson; M K Malec; T L Phillips; M D Prados; C O Scharfen; K A Weaver; W M Wara Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1994-07-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Ying Zhu; Geoffrey S Young; Zhong Xue; Raymond Y Huang; Hui You; Kian Setayesh; Hiroto Hatabu; Fei Cao; Stephen T Wong Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2012-05-15 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Ying Zhuge; Andra V Krauze; Holly Ning; Jason Y Cheng; Barbara C Arora; Kevin Camphausen; Robert W Miller Journal: Med Phys Date: 2017-08-20 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: M Principi; M Italiani; A Guiducci; I Aprile; M Muti; G Giulianelli; P Ottaviano Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2003-03-05 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Gaurav D Shah; Santosh Kesari; Ronghui Xu; Tracy T Batchelor; Alison M O'Neill; Fred H Hochberg; Brenda Levy; Joanna Bradshaw; Patrick Y Wen Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Jingxin Nie; Zhong Xue; Tianming Liu; Geoffrey S Young; Kian Setayesh; Lei Guo; Stephen T C Wong Journal: Comput Med Imaging Graph Date: 2009-05-14 Impact factor: 4.790
Authors: Birgit B Ertl-Wagner; Jeffrey D Blume; Donald Peck; Jayaram K Udupa; Benjamin Herman; Anthony Levering; Ilona M Schmalfuss Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-10-17 Impact factor: 5.315