Literature DB >> 10728343

Regrets or no regrets? No regrets! The fate of rejected manuscripts.

T Opthof1, F Furstner, M van Geer, R Coronel.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2000        PMID： 10728343     DOI： 10.1016/s0008-6363(99)00339-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Res        ISSN： 0008-6363            Impact factor:   10.787


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Fraud and misconduct in science: the stem cell seduction: Implications for the peer-review process.

Authors:  M A G van der Heyden; T van de Ven; T Opthof
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.380

2.  Establishing Sensible and Practical Guidelines for Desk Rejections.

Authors:  Jaime A Teixeira da Silva; Aceil Al-Khatib; Vedran Katavić; Helmar Bornemann-Cimenti
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Assessing peer review by gauging the fate of rejected manuscripts: the case of the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation.

Authors:  Niccolò Casnici; Francisco Grimaldo; Nigel Gilbert; Pierpaolo Dondio; Flaminio Squazzoni
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 3.238

4.  Fate of Manuscripts Rejected by a Specialty Psychiatry Journal: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Vikas Menon; Karumarakandy Puthiyapurayil Jayaprakashan; Natarajan Varadharajan; Shahul Ameen; Samir Kumar Praharaj
Journal:  Indian J Psychol Med       Date:  2021-10-13

5.  When are hypotheses useful in ecology and evolution?

Authors:  Matthew G Betts; Adam S Hadley; David W Frey; Sarah J K Frey; Dusty Gannon; Scott H Harris; Hankyu Kim; Urs G Kormann; Kara Leimberger; Katie Moriarty; Joseph M Northrup; Ben Phalan; Josée S Rousseau; Thomas D Stokely; Jonathon J Valente; Chris Wolf; Diego Zárrate-Charry
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 2.912
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.