| Literature DB >> 10727833 |
C Tegtmeier1, S N Grell, U Riber, N F Friis.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to examine the ability of Haemophilus somnus and Mycoplasma dispar to induce pneumonia in healthy calves under conditions closely resembling the supposed natural way of infection, viz. by inhalation of aerosol droplets containing the microorganisms. The infections were investigated by recording clinical data, cytokine expression of peripheral blood cells and pathology. Twelve calves were included in the study: Three animals were exposed to H. somnus only, and two to M. dispar only, whereas five were challenged to M. dispar followed by exposure to H. somnus 11-14 days later. Also, one calf was exposed to M. dispar followed by exposure to a sterile saline solution 11 days later, and one calf was only exposed to a sterile saline solution. Just one animal, only challenged with H. somnus, developed a focal necrotizing pneumonia, from which H. somnus was isolated. Thus, the ability of H. somnus and M. dispar to act as primary pathogens under these conditions were minimal and inconsistent.However, a transient rise in body temperature, a marked granulocytosis and increased levels of interleukin-8 in peripheral blood after inoculation with H. somnus indicated a clear systemic response, probably as a consequence of the natural non-specific local and systemic defence mechanisms acting in healthy calves.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2000 PMID: 10727833 PMCID: PMC7117456 DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(99)00181-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Microbiol ISSN: 0378-1135 Impact factor: 3.293
Results of necropsy and microbiological examinations of lungs of calves inoculated with Mycoplasma dispar and Haemophilus somnus
| Inoculation with | Euthanasia | Necropsy findings | Microbiology | ||||
| Calf No. | Sterile saline | Bacterial-, viral-, & mycoplasma examination | |||||
| Lung | Nasal svab | ||||||
| 1 | – | Day 0 | – | Day 4 | Acute focal necrotizing pneumonia | ||
| 2 | – | Day 0 | – | Day 4 | None | None | |
| 3 | – | Day 0 | – | Day 4 | None | None | |
| 4 | Day −11 | – | – | Day 0 | None | Negative | |
| 5 | Day −11 | – | – | Day 0 | None | Negative | |
| 6 | Day −11 | Day 0 | – | Day 4 | None | ||
| 7 | Day −11 | Day 0 | – | Day 4 | None | ||
| 8 | Day −11 | Day 0 | – | Day 4 | None | ||
| 9 | Day −14 | Day 0 | – | Day 4 | None | ||
| 10 | Day −14 | Day 0 | – | Day 4 | None | ||
| 11 | Day −11 | – | Day 0 | Day 4 | None | Negative | |
| 12 | – | – | Day 0 | Day 4 | None | None | Negative |
The time of challenge with H. somnus was considered as Day 0.
In some animals, a few atelectatic lobules were present at necropsy, these are not mentioned in the table.
Lung tissue was examined for the presence of pathogenic bacteria, virus and mycoplasmas.
Nasal svabs were examined only for bacteria.
Fig. 1Leukocyte counts of peripheral blood in calves infected with Haemophilus somnus. All calves were aerosol inoculated with H. somnus at Day 0. ■: Mean ±SEM of inoculated calves (No. 6–10), (the latter two were only sampled at −1 h, 3 h, 24 h p.i.). □: One calf (No. 11) infected with M. dispar on Day −11 and saline on Day 0. Measurements were performed in duplicate.