Literature DB >> 10727161

Contact allergy, irritancy and 'danger'.

J P McFadden1, D A Basketter.   

Abstract

Conventional models of the immune response are based on distinguishing self and non-self. However, we consider that the more recently proposed 'danger' model may be an illuminating alternative for studying allergic contact dermatitis. In this model, an antigenic signal on its own would tend to produce tolerance. In contrast, in the presence of a 'danger' signal, which, in the case of allergic contact dermatitis, we suggest is usually cutaneous irritancy, the immune system would become activated, leading first to the induction of sensitization and then subsequently to the elicitation of a contact hypersensitivity response. In most cases, both the antigenic signal and irritant signal will come from the hapten, although, e.g., in an occupational setting, traumiterative dermatitis would be the source of the 'danger' signal. Typically, the irritant signal tends to be more concentration-dependent and thus is the overriding factor in the determination of the effective sensitizing and eliciting concentrations of the hapten. A further prediction of this hypothesis is that successful experiments demonstrating low-dose tolerance with contact allergens may be explained by the loss of the irritant effect at lower dilutions, whilst an antigenic stimulus remains present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10727161     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.042003123.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  10 in total

Review 1.  Occupational skin-protection products--a review.

Authors:  J Kresken; A Klotz
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-05-21       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  [The public health issue of allergic contact dermatitis].

Authors:  A Schnuch; V Mahler
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 3.  Skin and respiratory chemical allergy: confluence and divergence in a hybrid adverse outcome pathway.

Authors:  Ian Kimber; Alan Poole; David A Basketter
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 3.524

Review 4.  Pathomechanisms of Contact Sensitization.

Authors:  Philipp R Esser; Stefan F Martin
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 5.  [Extended understanding of pathogenesis and treatment of contact allergy].

Authors:  Philipp R Esser; Stefan F Martin
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 0.751

6.  Potential Inhibitory Influence of miRNA 210 on Regulatory T Cells during Epicutaneous Chemical Sensitization.

Authors:  Carrie Mae Long; Ewa Lukomska; Nikki B Marshall; Ajay Nayak; Stacey E Anderson
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 7.  Cytokines and chemokines in irritant contact dermatitis.

Authors:  Haur Yueh Lee; Marco Stieger; Nikhil Yawalkar; Masato Kakeda
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 4.711

8.  Titanium salts tested in reconstructed human skin with integrated MUTZ-3-derived Langerhans cells show an irritant rather than a sensitizing potential.

Authors:  Charlotte T Rodrigues Neves; Sander W Spiekstra; Niels P J de Graaf; Thomas Rustemeyer; Albert J Feilzer; Cees J Kleverlaan; Susan Gibbs
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 6.600

9.  Differential influence of Streptococcus mitis on host response to metals in reconstructed human skin and oral mucosa.

Authors:  Lin Shang; Dongmei Deng; Sanne Roffel; Susan Gibbs
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  Interpretation of murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) data for skin sensitization: Overload effects, danger signals and chemistry-based read-across.

Authors:  David W Roberts
Journal:  Curr Res Toxicol       Date:  2021-01-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.