Literature DB >> 10725297

Coronary physiology revisited : practical insights from the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

M J Kern1.   

Abstract

Various coronary physiological measurements can be made in the cardiac catheterization laboratory using sensor-tipped guidewires; they include the measurement of poststenotic absolute coronary flow reserve, the relative coronary flow reserve, and the pressure-derived fractional flow reserve of the myocardium. Ambiguity regarding abnormal microcirculation has been reduced or eliminated with measurements of relative coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve. The role of microvascular flow impairment can be separately determined with coronary flow velocity reserve measurements. In addition to lesion assessment before and after intervention, emerging applications of coronary physiology include the determination of physiological responses to new pharmacological agents, such as glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers, in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Measurements of coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory provide objective data that complement angiography for clinical decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10725297     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.101.11.1344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  46 in total

1.  Coronary flow: clinical considerations.

Authors:  D V Cokkinos; A Manginas; V Voudris
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Optimum guidance of complex PCI by coronary pressure measurement.

Authors:  Nico H J Pijls
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Myocardial blood flow: Putting it into clinical perspective.

Authors:  Thomas Hellmut Schindler
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Hemodynamic evaluation of saphenous vein coronary artery bypass grafts: relative merits of Doppler flow velocity and SPECT perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Liesbeth P Salm; Jeroen J Bax; J Wouter Jukema; Susan E Langerak; Hubert W Vliegen; Paul Steendijk; Hildo J Lamb; Albert de Roos; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Defining the "gold standard": a changing paradigm.

Authors:  Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  PET-measured heterogeneity in longitudinal myocardial blood flow in response to sympathetic and pharmacologic stress as a non-invasive probe of epicardial vasomotor dysfunction.

Authors:  Thomas H Schindler; Alvaro D Facta; John O Prior; Roxana Campisi; Masayuki Inubushi; Michael C Kreissl; Xiao-Li Zhang; James Sayre; Magnus Dahlbom; Heinrich R Schelbert
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  The Achilles heel of SPECT imaging: the false-positive scans--or are they?

Authors:  Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Role of PET in the evaluation and understanding of coronary physiology.

Authors:  Thomas H Schindler; Xiao-Li Zhang; Gabriella Vincenti; Leila Mhiri; René Lerch; Heinrich R Schelbert
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Fractional flow reserve application in everyday practice: adherence to clinical recommendations.

Authors:  Katia Orvin; Tamir Bental; Alon Eisen; Hana Vaknin-Assa; Abid Assali; Eli I Lev; David Brosh; Ran Kornowski
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-09

10.  Adenosine versus regadenoson comparative evaluation in myocardial perfusion imaging: results of the ADVANCE phase 3 multicenter international trial.

Authors:  Ami E Iskandrian; Timothy M Bateman; Luiz Belardinelli; Brent Blackburn; Manuel D Cerqueira; Robert C Hendel; Hsiao Lieu; John J Mahmarian; Ann Olmsted; S Richard Underwood; João Vitola; Whedy Wang
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.