BACKGROUND: The present study was conducted among Chinese workers employed in glue- and shoe-making factories who had an average daily personal benzene exposure of 31+/-26 ppm (mean+/-SD). The metabolites monitored were S-phenylmercapturic acid (S-PMA), trans, trans-muconic acid (t,t-MA), hydroquinone (HQ), catechol (CAT), 1,2, 4-trihydroxybenzene (benzene triol, BT), and phenol. METHODS: S-PMA, t,t-MA, HQ, CAT, and BT were quantified by HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry. Phenol was measured by GC-MS. RESULTS: Levels of benzene metabolites (except BT) measured in urine samples collected from exposed workers at the end of workshift were significantly higher than those measured in unexposed subjects (P < 0.0001). The large increases in urinary metabolites from before to after work strongly correlated with benzene exposure. Concentrations of these metabolites in urine samples collected from exposed workers before work were also significantly higher than those from unexposed subjects. The half-lives of S-PMA, t,t-MA, HQ, CAT, and phenol were estimated from a time course study to be 12.8, 13.7, 12.7, 15.0, and 16.3 h, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: All metabolites, except BT, are good markers for benzene exposure at the observed levels; however, due to their high background, HQ, CAT, and phenol may not distinguish unexposed subjects from workers exposed to benzene at low ambient levels. S-PMA and t,t-MA are the most sensitive markers for low level benzene exposure. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND: The present study was conducted among Chinese workers employed in glue- and shoe-making factories who had an average daily personal benzene exposure of 31+/-26 ppm (mean+/-SD). The metabolites monitored were S-phenylmercapturic acid (S-PMA), trans, trans-muconic acid (t,t-MA), hydroquinone (HQ), catechol (CAT), 1,2, 4-trihydroxybenzene (benzenetriol, BT), and phenol. METHODS:S-PMA, t,t-MA, HQ, CAT, and BT were quantified by HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry. Phenol was measured by GC-MS. RESULTS: Levels of benzene metabolites (except BT) measured in urine samples collected from exposed workers at the end of workshift were significantly higher than those measured in unexposed subjects (P < 0.0001). The large increases in urinary metabolites from before to after work strongly correlated with benzene exposure. Concentrations of these metabolites in urine samples collected from exposed workers before work were also significantly higher than those from unexposed subjects. The half-lives of S-PMA, t,t-MA, HQ, CAT, and phenol were estimated from a time course study to be 12.8, 13.7, 12.7, 15.0, and 16.3 h, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: All metabolites, except BT, are good markers for benzene exposure at the observed levels; however, due to their high background, HQ, CAT, and phenol may not distinguish unexposed subjects from workers exposed to benzene at low ambient levels. S-PMA and t,t-MA are the most sensitive markers for low level benzene exposure. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Scott M Arnold; Juergen Angerer; Peter J Boogaard; Michael F Hughes; Raegan B O'Lone; Steven H Robison; A Robert Schnatter Journal: Crit Rev Toxicol Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 5.635
Authors: Clayton B'Hymer; Edward Krieg; Kenneth L Cheever; Christine A Toennis; John C Clark; James S Kesner; Roger Gibson; Mary Ann Butler Journal: J Toxicol Environ Health A Date: 2012
Authors: Stephen M Rappaport; Sungkyoon Kim; Reuben Thomas; Brent A Johnson; Frederic Y Bois; Lawrence L Kupper Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2012-12-07 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Piero Lovreglio; Anna Barbieri; Mariella Carrieri; Laura Sabatini; Maria Enrica Fracasso; Denise Doria; Ignazio Drago; Antonella Basso; Maria Nicolà D'Errico; Giovanni Battista Bartolucci; Francesco Saverio Violante; Leonardo Soleo Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2009-10-14 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Caihong Xing; Francesco Marchetti; Guilan Li; Rosana H Weldon; Elaine Kurtovich; Suzanne Young; Thomas E Schmid; Luoping Zhang; Stephen Rappaport; Suramya Waidyanatha; Andrew J Wyrobek; Brenda Eskenazi Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-01-06 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Guanhu Bao; Matthew Clifton; Trisha M Hoette; Kiyoshi Mori; Shi-Xian Deng; Andong Qiu; Melanie Viltard; David Williams; Neal Paragas; Thomas Leete; Ritwij Kulkarni; Xiangpo Li; Belinda Lee; Avtandil Kalandadze; Adam J Ratner; Juan Carlos Pizarro; Kai M Schmidt-Ott; Donald W Landry; Kenneth N Raymond; Roland K Strong; Jonathan Barasch Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2010-06-27 Impact factor: 15.040
Authors: Steven G Carmella; Menglan Chen; Shaomei Han; Anna Briggs; Joni Jensen; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Stephen S Hecht Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 3.739