Literature DB >> 10722495

In vivo pharmacodynamic activities of two glycylcyclines (GAR-936 and WAY 152,288) against various gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.

M L van Ogtrop1, D Andes, T J Stamstad, B Conklin, W J Weiss, W A Craig, O Vesga.   

Abstract

The in vivo pharmacodynamic activities of two glycylcyclines (GAR-936 and WAY 152,288) were assessed in an experimental murine thigh infection model in neutropenic mice. Mice were infected with one of several strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, or Klebsiella pneumoniae. Most infections were treated with a twice-daily dosing schedule, with administration of 0.75 to 192 mg of GAR-936 or WAY 152,288 per kg of body weight. A maximum-effect dose-response model was used to calculate the dose that produced a net bacteriostatic effect over 24 h of therapy. This dose was called the bacteriostatic dose. More extensive dosing studies were performed with S. pneumoniae 1199, E. coli ATCC 25922, and K. pneumoniae ATCC 43816, with doses being given as one, two, four, or eight equal doses over a period of 24 h. The dosing schedules were designed in order to minimize the interrelationship between the various pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters studied. These parameters were time above 0.03 to 32 times the MIC, area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), and maximum concentration of drug in serum (C(max)). The bacteriostatic dose remained essentially the same, irrespective of the dosing frequency, for S. pneumoniae 1199 (0.3 to 0.9 mg/kg/day). For E. coli ATCC 25922 and K. pneumoniae ATCC 43816, however, more frequent dosing led to lower bacteriostatic doses. Pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated dose-dependent elimination half-lives of 1.05 to 2.34 and 1.65 to 3.36 h and serum protein bindings of 59 and 71% for GAR-936 and WAY 152,288, respectively. GAR-936 and WAY 152,288 were similarly effective against the microorganisms studied, with small differences in maximum effect and 50% effective dose. The glycylcyclines were also similarly effective against tetracycline-sensitive and tetracycline-resistant bacteria. Time above a certain factor (range, 0.5 to 4 times) of the MIC was a better predictor of in vivo efficacy than C(max) or AUC for most organism-drug combinations. The results demonstrate that in order to achieve 80% maximum efficacy, the concentration of unbound drug in serum should be maintained above the MIC for at least 50% of the time for GAR-936 and for at least 75% of the time for WAY 152,288. The results of these experiments will aid in the rational design of dose-finding studies for these glycylcyclines in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10722495      PMCID: PMC89796          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.44.4.943-949.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  14 in total

1.  Activity of glycylcyclines CL 329998 and CL 331002 against minocycline-resistant and other strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J M Hamilton-Miller; S Shah
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Simultaneous modeling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics with nonparametric kinetic and dynamic models.

Authors:  J D Unadkat; F Bartha; L B Sheiner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Correlation of antimicrobial pharmacokinetic parameters with therapeutic efficacy in an animal model.

Authors:  B Vogelman; S Gudmundsson; J Leggett; J Turnidge; S Ebert; W A Craig
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  In vitro activities of two glycylcyclines against gram-positive bacteria.

Authors:  G M Eliopoulos; C B Wennersten; G Cole; R C Moellering
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Understanding the dose-effect relationship: clinical application of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models.

Authors:  N H Holford; L B Sheiner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1981 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of the glycylcyclines, a new class of semisynthetic tetracyclines.

Authors:  R T Testa; P J Petersen; N V Jacobus; P E Sum; V J Lee; F P Tally
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  N,N-dimethylglycyl-amido derivative of minocycline and 6-demethyl-6-desoxytetracycline, two new glycylcyclines highly effective against tetracycline-resistant gram-positive cocci.

Authors:  F W Goldstein; M D Kitzis; J F Acar
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Comparative antibiotic dose-effect relations at several dosing intervals in murine pneumonitis and thigh-infection models.

Authors:  J E Leggett; B Fantin; S Ebert; K Totsuka; B Vogelman; W Calame; H Mattie; W A Craig
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  In vitro activities of two glycylcyclines.

Authors:  R Wise; J M Andrews
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  In vivo postantibiotic effect in a thigh infection in neutropenic mice.

Authors:  B Vogelman; S Gudmundsson; J Turnidge; J Leggett; W A Craig
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 5.226

View more
  50 in total

1.  Activities of the glycylcycline tigecycline (GAR-936) against 1,924 recent European clinical bacterial isolates.

Authors:  D Milatovic; F-J Schmitz; J Verhoef; A C Fluit
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Frequentist and Bayesian pharmacometric-based approaches to facilitate critically needed new antibiotic development: overcoming lies, damn lies, and statistics.

Authors:  Paul G Ambrose; Jeffrey P Hammel; Sujata M Bhavnani; Christopher M Rubino; Evelyn J Ellis-Grosse; George L Drusano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Overexpression of the adeB gene in clinical isolates of tigecycline-nonsusceptible Acinetobacter baumannii without insertion mutations in adeRS.

Authors:  Jun-Ren Sun; Ming-Chin Chan; Tein-Yao Chang; Wei-Yao Wang; Tzong-Shi Chiueh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Tigecycline.

Authors:  James E Frampton; Monique P Curran
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Microglial activation as a priming event leading to paraquat-induced dopaminergic cell degeneration.

Authors:  Maya G Purisai; Alison L McCormack; Suzanne Cumine; Jie Li; Martha Z Isla; Donato A Di Monte
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 5.996

6.  Pharmacokinetics of tigecycline after single and multiple doses in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Gopal Muralidharan; Marlynne Micalizzi; John Speth; Donald Raible; Steven Troy
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Postantibiotic effect of tigecycline against 14 gram-positive organisms.

Authors:  G A Pankuch; P C Appelbaum
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  In Vivo Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Omadacycline (PTK 0796) against Streptococcus pneumoniae in the Murine Pneumonia Model.

Authors:  Alexander J Lepak; Miao Zhao; Karen Marchillo; Jamie VanHecker; David R Andes
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Evaluation of ceftazidime and NXL104 in two murine models of infection due to KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Authors:  Andrea Endimiani; Kristine M Hujer; Andrea M Hujer; Mark E Pulse; William J Weiss; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Comparison of the in vitro activity of the glycylcycline tigecycline (formerly GAR-936) with those of tetracycline, minocycline, and doxycycline against isolates of nontuberculous mycobacteria.

Authors:  Richard J Wallace; Barbara A Brown-Elliott; Christopher J Crist; Linda Mann; Rebecca W Wilson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.