Literature DB >> 10719283

Prediction of fracture from low bone mineral density measurements overestimates risk.

J A Kanis1, O Johnell, A Oden, B Jonsson, C De Laet, A Dawson.   

Abstract

There is a well-established relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk. Estimates of the relative risk of fracture from BMD have been derived mainly from short-term studies in which the correlation between BMD at assessment and BMD in later life ranged from 0.8 to 0.9. Because individuals lose bone mineral at different rates throughout later life, the long-term predictive value of low BMD is likely to decrease progressively with time. This article examines and formalizes the relationship between current BMD, correlation coefficients, and long-term risk. The loss of predictive value has important implications for early assessment and supports the view that measurements should be optimally targeted at the time interventions are contemplated and, when necessary, repeated in later life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10719283     DOI: 10.1016/S8756-3282(00)00238-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  12 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis: reviews in endocrine and metabolic disorders.

Authors:  A T Shields; C H Chesnut
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  Bone densitometry is not a good predictor of hip fracture.

Authors:  T J Wilkin; D Devendra
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-06

3.  Low serum vitamin D is associated with increased mortality in elderly men: MrOS Sweden.

Authors:  H Johansson; A Odén; J Kanis; E McCloskey; M Lorentzon; Ö Ljunggren; M K Karlsson; P M Thorsby; Å Tivesten; E Barrett-Connor; C Ohlsson; D Mellström
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Frederik Borgstrom; Chris De Laet; Helena Johansson; Olof Johnell; Bengt Jonsson; Anders Oden; Niklas Zethraeus; Bruce Pfleger; Nikolai Khaltaev
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Choosing wisely: the American College of Rheumatology's Top 5 list of things physicians and patients should question.

Authors:  Jinoos Yazdany; Gabriela Schmajuk; Mark Robbins; David Daikh; Ashley Beall; Edward Yelin; Jennifer Barton; Adam Carlson; Mary Margaretten; Joann Zell; Lianne S Gensler; Victoria Kelly; Kenneth Saag; Charles King
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.794

6.  Risk communication methods in hip fracture prevention: a randomised trial in primary care.

Authors:  Ben Hudson; Les Toop; Dee Mangin; John Pearson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Ten-year probabilities of clinical vertebral fractures according to phalangeal quantitative ultrasonography.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; C De Laet; F de Terlizzi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Compressive axial mechanical properties of rat bone as functions of bone volume fraction, apparent density and micro-ct based mineral density.

Authors:  Esther Cory; Ara Nazarian; Vahid Entezari; Vartan Vartanians; Ralph Müller; Brian D Snyder
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Forearm bone mineral density in an unselected population of 2,779 men and women--the HUNT Study, Norway.

Authors:  Siri Forsmo; Arnulf Langhammer; Lisa Forsen; Berit Schei
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Cost effectiveness of the German screen-and-treat strategy for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Dirk Mueller; Eva Weyler; Afschin Gandjour
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.