Literature DB >> 10718452

Sensory receptors of the larynx.

R M Bradley1.   

Abstract

The larynx is a highly reflexogenic area, and stimulation with mechanical and chemical stimuli results in a number of protective reflexes. Investigators have used anatomical, behavioral, and neurophysiological techniques to examine the receptors responsible for initiating these reflex responses. Histologic examination has revealed the presence of free nerve endings, Merkel cells, Meissner corpuscles, and taste buds. Mechanoreceptors have been classified in several different ways and are located either in the superficial mucosa or in muscles and laryngeal joints. Recordings from afferent fibers innervating laryngeal mechanoreceptors have revealed that some of them are spontaneously active whereas others are silent until stimulated. Laryngeal mechanoreceptors respond to stimulation with either a rapidly adapting or a slowly adapting response pattern. Often the mechanoreceptors respond to respiratory movement of the larynx, giving bursts of action potentials during inspiration. A large number of taste buds that are anatomically similar to lingual taste buds populates the laryngeal surface of the epiglottis. Taste buds of the larynx respond to a number of chemical stimuli and to water. They do not respond to NaCl solutions close to physiological concentrations (0.154 M) but do respond at both a lower and higher concentration. When water is the solvent for the chemical stimuli, most chemicals initiate a response in laryngeal taste buds. However, when 0.154 M saline is used as a solvent, chemicals that taste bitter or sweet when applied to the tongue are ineffective stimuli. Taste buds of the larynx tend to be stimulated by the pH and tonicity of the stimulating solution and not by the gustatory properties. These results reveal a fundamental difference between the chemoreceptors of the oral cavity and larynx and result in the conclusion that chemoreceptors of the larynx do not play a role in gustation but are adapted to detect chemicals that are not saline-like in composition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10718452     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00339-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  25 in total

1.  In vivo recordings from rat geniculate ganglia: taste response properties of individual greater superficial petrosal and chorda tympani neurones.

Authors:  Suzanne I Sollars; David L Hill
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Laryngeal muscle responses to mechanical displacement of the thyroid cartilage in humans.

Authors:  Torrey M J Loucks; Christopher J Poletto; Keith G Saxon; Christy L Ludlow
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2005-06-02

3.  Liquiritin apioside attenuates laryngeal chemoreflex but not mechanoreflex in rat pups.

Authors:  Wan Wei; Xiuping Gao; Lei Zhao; Jianguo Zhuang; Yang Jiao; Fadi Xu
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 5.464

4.  Morphology of P2X3-immunoreactive nerve endings in the rat laryngeal mucosa.

Authors:  Natsumi Takahashi; Nobuaki Nakamuta; Yoshio Yamamoto
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 4.304

Review 5.  TRPs in taste and chemesthesis.

Authors:  Stephen D Roper
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2014

6.  Analysis of carbonated thin liquids in pediatric neurogenic dysphagia.

Authors:  Jennifer P Lundine; D Gregory Bates; David G Bates; Han Yin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-03-11

Review 7.  Cracking taste codes by tapping into sensory neuron impulse traffic.

Authors:  Marion E Frank; Robert F Lundy; Robert J Contreras
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 8.  Gustatory hedonic value: potential function for forebrain control of brainstem taste processing.

Authors:  Robert F Lundy
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  Cortical gating of oropharyngeal sensory stimuli.

Authors:  Karen Wheeler-Hegland; Teresa Pitts; Paul W Davenport
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  The reflex effects on the respiratory regulation of the CO2 at the different flow rate and concentration.

Authors:  Nermin Yelmen; Gulderen Sahin; Tulin Oruc; Ibrahim Guner
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.