Literature DB >> 10718062

Effects of gender marking in pronominal coindexation.

F Rigalleau1, D Caplan.   

Abstract

The naming latency of a pronoun was measured when a single previously presented name in a discourse either agreed or did not agree with the pronoun in gender and person. An effect of agreement was found both under conditions in which subjects were likely to have engaged in strategic processing of the pronoun (Experiment 1) and under conditions in which this was unlikely (Experiment 3). The effect of gender agreement was also investigated when two noun phrases were present in the discourse. The results continued to show an immediate effect of gender agreement (naming latencies increased when a pronoun did not agree with one of two previously presented nouns) under experimental conditions likely to engender strategic processing (Experiment 2). This last effect was not significant under experimental conditions that were not likely to engender strategic processing (Experiment 3). The results are discussed in terms of models of the process of identifying the referent of a pronoun in a discourse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10718062     DOI: 10.1080/713755884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  3 in total

1.  Rules of engagement: incomplete and complete pronoun resolution.

Authors:  Jessica Love; Gail McKoon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  What's in a (role) name? Formal and conceptual aspects of comprehending personal nouns.

Authors:  Lisa Irmen
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2007-11

3.  Prominence-sensitive pronoun resolution: New evidence from the speed-accuracy tradeoff procedure.

Authors:  Dave Kush; Clinton L Johns; Julie A Van Dyke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.051

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.