Literature DB >> 10715512

Experimental design and methods for school-based randomized trials. Experience from the Hutchinson Smoking Prevention Project (HSPP).

A V Peterson1, S L Mann, K A Kealey, P M Marek.   

Abstract

Nonadherence to accepted design principles for randomized trials has been a limitation of school-based intervention research. Designed to overcome these limitations, the Hutchinson Smoking Prevention Project (HSPP) is a 15-year randomized trial to determine the extent to which a school-based (grades 3-12) tobacco use prevention intervention can deter youth tobacco use throughout and beyond high school. This paper presents the HSPP experimental design, together with methods for its implementation, and an evaluation of the degree to which HSPP has adhered to principles of randomized trials. Results from the experimental design and its conduct include (1) a recruitment rate of 97.6% (40 of 41 targeted school districts), (2) full and active participation for the trial's duration by 100% of the 40 school districts recruited, (3) implementation by virtually all teachers (99%+), with 86% implementation fidelity, and (4) outcome determination for 94.3% (7910) of 8388 original study participants identified 12 years previously at baseline. The high degree of rigor achieved by the HSPP experimental design ensures confidence in the trial's soon-to-be available intervention effectiveness results. Equally important, for future school-based trials, the HSPP design and its execution have illustrated that school-based research can adhere to the principles of rigorous randomized trials, with high rates of implementation, and very high rates of recruitment, maintenance, and follow-up of study participants, even for studies with decade-long follow-up periods. Rigor in school-based trials can be achieved through a combination of (1) commitment to the principles of randomized trials, (2) attention to the special challenges of trials specific to the school setting, (3) adoption and meticulous execution of proven methods for trial conduct, and (4) establishment at the outset of principles for maintaining positive collaborative relationships with participating school districts for the duration of the trial. These findings are important in light of the great potential for using the nation's schools to access youth for health promotion/risk-factor prevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10715512     DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(99)00050-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  15 in total

1.  Minority participation in a school-based randomized clinical trial of tooth decay prevention in the United States.

Authors:  Suchitra Nelson; Peter Milgrom
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Parental smoking cessation and child daily smoking: A 9-year longitudinal study of mediation by child cognitions about smoking.

Authors:  Christopher M Wyszynski; Jonathan B Bricker; Bryan A Comstock
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Implementing school malaria surveys in Kenya: towards a national surveillance system.

Authors:  Caroline W Gitonga; Peris N Karanja; Jimmy Kihara; Mariam Mwanje; Elizabeth Juma; Robert W Snow; Abdisalan M Noor; Simon Brooker
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 2.979

4.  Parents who quit smoking and their adult children's smoking cessation: a 20-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Jonathan B Bricker; Roy Otten; Jingmin L Liu; Arthur V Peterson
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 5.  Therapy for specific problems: youth tobacco cessation.

Authors:  Susan J Curry; Robin J Mermelstein; Amy K Sporer
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 6.  School-based programmes for preventing smoking.

Authors:  Roger E Thomas; Julie McLellan; Rafael Perera
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-04-30

7.  The Active for Life Year 5 (AFLY5) school based cluster randomised controlled trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Debbie A Lawlor; Russell Jago; Sian M Noble; Catherine R Chittleborough; Rona Campbell; Julie Mytton; Laura D Howe; Tim J Peters; Ruth R Kipping
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-07-24       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  When things are not as they appear: assessing the adequacy of cluster randomization when outcome events are rare at baseline.

Authors:  Veronica Dinaj-Koci; Nanika Brathwaite; Lynette Deveaux; Sonya Lunn; Lesley Cottrell; Carole Harris; Bonita Stanton; Xiaoming Li; Sharon Marshall; Perry Gomez; Xinguang Chen
Journal:  AIDS Res Treat       Date:  2012-05-08

Review 9.  Strategies for enhancing the implementation of school-based policies or practices targeting risk factors for chronic disease.

Authors:  Luke Wolfenden; Nicole K Nathan; Rachel Sutherland; Sze Lin Yoong; Rebecca K Hodder; Rebecca J Wyse; Tessa Delaney; Alice Grady; Alison Fielding; Flora Tzelepis; Tara Clinton-McHarg; Benjamin Parmenter; Peter Butler; John Wiggers; Adrian Bauman; Andrew Milat; Debbie Booth; Christopher M Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-29

Review 10.  Facilitators and barriers to pediatric clinical trial recruitment and retention in rural and community settings: A scoping review of the literature.

Authors:  Sara E Watson; Paul Smith; Jessica Snowden; Vida Vaughn; Lesley Cottrell; Christi A Madden; Alberta S Kong; Russell McCulloh; Crystal Stack Lim; Megan Bledsoe; Karen Kowal; Mary McNally; Lisa Knight; Kelly Cowan; Elizabeth Yakes Jimenez
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 4.438

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.