OBJECTIVES: To ascertain if immunization results in the restoration of responses to recall antigens, in the development of responses to presumed neoantigens, and to identify the virologic and immunologic correlates of these responses in persons with HIV-1 infection. DESIGN AND SETTING: Open-label study carried out at three university-affiliated AIDS Clinical Trials Units in the United States. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one subjects participating in AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 375 who had received zidovudine, lamivudine, and ritonavir for at least 48 weeks. Subjects were immunized with tetanus toxoid (TT) at entry and with inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (hep A) and keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) at entry and 6 weeks. The development of antibody, lymphocyte proliferative assay (LPA), and delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses after immunization were monitored. RESULTS: The LPA and DTH responses to TT improved in 57 and 68% of participants, respectively; 73 and 65% developed enhanced LPA and DTH responses to KLH. Forty-eight percent of patients developed a four-fold increase in antibody concentration to tetanus. Seventy-three percent of patients without detectable hepatitis A antibodies at baseline developed antibodies after immunization. Eighty-three percent of patients experienced at least a four-fold rise in KLH antibody concentration. Immune activation and viral load predicted poor recall responses and the number of memory CD4+ T-cells predicted good responses to recall antigens. Naïve CD4+ T-cell numbers, decrease in viral load, increases in CD4+ and CD28+ cells, and decreases in immune activation were associated with responses to presumed neoantigens. CONCLUSIONS: Most HIV-infected patients treated with potent combination antiretrovirals develop responses to recall and presumed neoantigens after immunization. Functional immune restoration in response to immunization is related to control of viral replication, decreased immune activation as well as to both quantitative and qualitative restoration of circulating T- lymphocyte subpopulations.
OBJECTIVES: To ascertain if immunization results in the restoration of responses to recall antigens, in the development of responses to presumed neoantigens, and to identify the virologic and immunologic correlates of these responses in persons with HIV-1 infection. DESIGN AND SETTING: Open-label study carried out at three university-affiliated AIDS Clinical Trials Units in the United States. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one subjects participating in AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 375 who had received zidovudine, lamivudine, and ritonavir for at least 48 weeks. Subjects were immunized with tetanus toxoid (TT) at entry and with inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (hep A) and keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) at entry and 6 weeks. The development of antibody, lymphocyte proliferative assay (LPA), and delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses after immunization were monitored. RESULTS: The LPA and DTH responses to TT improved in 57 and 68% of participants, respectively; 73 and 65% developed enhanced LPA and DTH responses to KLH. Forty-eight percent of patients developed a four-fold increase in antibody concentration to tetanus. Seventy-three percent of patients without detectable hepatitis A antibodies at baseline developed antibodies after immunization. Eighty-three percent of patients experienced at least a four-fold rise in KLH antibody concentration. Immune activation and viral load predicted poor recall responses and the number of memory CD4+ T-cells predicted good responses to recall antigens. Naïve CD4+ T-cell numbers, decrease in viral load, increases in CD4+ and CD28+ cells, and decreases in immune activation were associated with responses to presumed neoantigens. CONCLUSIONS: Most HIV-infectedpatients treated with potent combination antiretrovirals develop responses to recall and presumed neoantigens after immunization. Functional immune restoration in response to immunization is related to control of viral replication, decreased immune activation as well as to both quantitative and qualitative restoration of circulating T- lymphocyte subpopulations.
Authors: Enrique Espinosa; Christopher E Ormsby; Gustavo Reyes-Terán; Robert Asaad; Scott F Sieg; Michael M Lederman Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Biswanath Majumder; Michelle L Janket; Elizabeth A Schafer; Keri Schaubert; Xiao-Li Huang; June Kan-Mitchell; Charles R Rinaldo; Velpandi Ayyavoo Journal: J Virol Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Gabriel Catano; Zoya A Chykarenko; Andrea Mangano; J-M Anaya; Weijing He; Alison Smith; Rosa Bologna; Luisa Sen; Robert A Clark; Andrew Lloyd; Ludmila Shostakovich-Koretskaya; Sunil K Ahuja Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2011-01-15 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Benigno Rodriguez; Hernan Valdez; Christoph G Lange; Robert Asaad; Kathy Medvik; Scott F Sieg Journal: Clin Immunol Date: 2010-05-15 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Joseph C Mudd; Patrick Murphy; Maura Manion; Robert Debernardo; Jeffrey Hardacre; John Ammori; Gareth A Hardy; Clifford V Harding; Ganapati H Mahabaleshwar; Mukesh K Jain; Jeffrey M Jacobson; Ari D Brooks; Sharon Lewis; Timothy W Schacker; Jodi Anderson; Elias K Haddad; Rafael A Cubas; Benigno Rodriguez; Scott F Sieg; Michael M Lederman Journal: Blood Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Autumn M Gallegos; Michael Hoerger; Nancy L Talbot; Michael S Krasner; Jennifer M Knight; Jan A Moynihan; Paul R Duberstein Journal: J Altern Complement Med Date: 2013-02-05 Impact factor: 2.579