Literature DB >> 10714386

Rate of intake, bites, and chews-the interpretation of lean-obese differences.

T A Spiegel1.   

Abstract

The microstructure of eating behavior reflects physical properties of food. Responses of lean and obese subjects to these physical properties are similar. For example, eating smaller bite-sized food units reduces initial ingestion rate and mean and local ingestion rate for the entire meal, but does not affect total intake in either lean or obese women. On the other hand, analysis of the microstructure of eating behavior also suggests that obese subjects are less hungry and are more motivated by food preferences than lean subjects. For example, in meals of bite-sized food units, initial ingestion rate is less affected by deprivation and more affected by food preference in obese than lean women. In buffet meals with a variety of foods, obese men eat dessert earlier in the meal, and eat more dessert and other energy dense foods than lean men. The research reviewed here suggests that treatments for obesity should not focus on modifying bite size and ingestion rate and other microstructural variables, which are largely determined by the physical properties of food. Instead, treatment should focus on food selection and the stimulatory effects of palatability on intake.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10714386     DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7634(99)00076-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  25 in total

Review 1.  Eating behaviors of children in the context of their family environment.

Authors:  Tanja V E Kral; Erin M Rauh
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-05-10

2.  Effects of food diameter on bite size per mouthful and chewing behavior.

Authors:  Kouichi Shiozawa; Yoshiki Ohnuki; Yasumasa Mototani; Daisuke Umeki; Aiko Ito; Yasutake Saeki; Nobuhiro Hanada; Satoshi Okumura
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.781

3.  Effect of eating rate on binge size in Bulimia Nervosa.

Authors:  Harry R Kissileff; Ellen J Zimmerli; Migdalia I Torres; Michael J Devlin; B Timothy Walsh
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-10-12

4.  Role of the corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 2 in the control of food intake in mice: a meal pattern analysis.

Authors:  A Tabarin; Y Diz-Chaves; D Consoli; M Monsaingeon; T L Bale; M D Culler; R Datta; F Drago; W W Vale; G F Koob; E P Zorrilla; A Contarino
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Stress-related cortisol response and laboratory eating behavior in obese women.

Authors:  Fabian Lorig; Gundula Rebecca Raphaela Kießl; Reinhold Gustav Laessle
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.652

6.  Relationship between bite size per mouthful and dental arch size in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Kouichi Shiozawa; Yasumasa Mototani; Kenji Suita; Aiko Ito; Naoya Kawamura; Yuka Yagisawa; Ichiro Matsuo; Yoshio Hayakawa; Megumi Nariyama; Daisuke Umeki; Yasutake Saeki; Yoshiki Ohnuki; Satoshi Okumura
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 2.781

7.  A description of an 'obesogenic' eating style that promotes higher energy intake and is associated with greater adiposity in 4.5year-old children: Results from the GUSTO cohort.

Authors:  Anna Fogel; Ai Ting Goh; Lisa R Fries; Suresh Anand Sadananthan; S Sendhil Velan; Navin Michael; Mya Thway Tint; Marielle Valerie Fortier; Mei Jun Chan; Jia Ying Toh; Yap-Seng Chong; Kok Hian Tan; Fabian Yap; Lynette P Shek; Michael J Meaney; Birit F P Broekman; Yung Seng Lee; Keith M Godfrey; Mary Foong Fong Chong; Ciarán G Forde
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-02-14

8.  Establishing meal patterns by lickometry in the marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus): translational applications from the bench to the field and the clinic.

Authors:  Corinna N Ross; Michael L Power; Suzette D Tardif
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 2.371

9.  Differences in laboratory eating behaviour between overweight boys and girls before treatment.

Authors:  R G Laessle; S Lehrke
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.652

10.  Impact of morbid obesity on chewing ability.

Authors:  J-L Veyrune; C Chaussain Miller; S Czernichow; C A Ciangura; E Nicolas; M Hennequin
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.