OBJECTIVES: A hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted using a sample of 138 school-age children with autism. The objective was to examine (1) the characteristics of resulting subgroups, (2) the relationship of these subgroups to subgroups of the same children determined at preschool age, and (3) preschool variables that best predicted school-age functioning. METHOD: Ninety-five cases were analyzed. RESULTS: Findings support the presence of 2 subgroups marked by different levels of social, language, and nonverbal ability, with the higher group showing essentially normal cognitive and behavioral scores. The relationship of high- and low-functioning subgroup membership to levels of functioning at preschool age was highly significant. CONCLUSIONS: School-age functioning was strongly predicted by preschool cognitive functioning but was not strongly predicted by preschool social abnormality or severity of autistic symptoms. The differential outcome of the 2 groups shows that high IQ is necessary but not sufficient for optimal outcome in the presence of severe language impairment.
OBJECTIVES: A hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted using a sample of 138 school-age children with autism. The objective was to examine (1) the characteristics of resulting subgroups, (2) the relationship of these subgroups to subgroups of the same children determined at preschool age, and (3) preschool variables that best predicted school-age functioning. METHOD: Ninety-five cases were analyzed. RESULTS: Findings support the presence of 2 subgroups marked by different levels of social, language, and nonverbal ability, with the higher group showing essentially normal cognitive and behavioral scores. The relationship of high- and low-functioning subgroup membership to levels of functioning at preschool age was highly significant. CONCLUSIONS: School-age functioning was strongly predicted by preschool cognitive functioning but was not strongly predicted by preschool social abnormality or severity of autistic symptoms. The differential outcome of the 2 groups shows that high IQ is necessary but not sufficient for optimal outcome in the presence of severe language impairment.
Authors: Saasha Sutera; Juhi Pandey; Emma L Esser; Michael A Rosenthal; Leandra B Wilson; Marianne Barton; James Green; Sarah Hodgson; Diana L Robins; Thyde Dumont-Mathieu; Deborah Fein Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2007-01-06
Authors: Valerie W Hu; Tewarit Sarachana; Kyung Soon Kim; AnhThu Nguyen; Shreya Kulkarni; Mara E Steinberg; Truong Luu; Yinglei Lai; Norman H Lee Journal: Autism Res Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 5.216