Literature DB >> 10710044

The myth of informed consent.

M Kirsch.   

Abstract

Informed consent is an integral element of ethical medical practice. However, unlike gastrointestinal endoscopy, the consent process is not standardized. Moreover, informed consent is often viewed as a legal necessity rather than as an expression of patients' autonomy. Elevating informed consent to its rightful place can enhance doctor-patient relationship.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh：

Year:  2000        PMID： 10710044     DOI： 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.01829.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN： 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  5 in total

Review 1.  Informed consent and the use of placebo in Poland: ethical and legal aspects.

Authors:  Piotr Zaborowski; Adam Górski
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  What do patients really want to know in an informed consent procedure? A questionnaire-based survey of patients in the Bath area, UK.

Authors:  H El-Wakeel; G J Taylor; J J T Tate
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  What a signature adds to the consent process.

Authors:  Peter Neary; Ronan A Cahill; W O Kirwan; E Kiely; H P Redmond
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Quality of informed consent for invasive procedures in central Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Mostafa A Abolfotouh; Abdallah A Adlan
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2012-03-20

5.  Combined written and oral information prior to gastrointestinal endoscopy compared with oral information alone: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Christian Felley; Thomas V Perneger; Isabelle Goulet; Catherine Rouillard; Nadereh Azar-Pey; Gian Dorta; Antoine Hadengue; Jean-Louis Frossard
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 3.067
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.