Literature DB >> 10709794

Positive versus negative framing of a hypothetical infant immunization: the influence of involvement.

R J Donovan1, G Jalleh.   

Abstract

Framing studies dealing with health messages show mixed results, although a tendency in favor of negative framing. Involvement has been hypothesized to account for these conflicting results. The authors selected a realistic issue (immunization of infants) deemed high or low involving depending on the respondent's circumstances: women with an infant or who were pregnant or intending to get pregnant in the next 12 months were deemed to be high involved; women in none of these categories were deemed to be low involved. A convenience sample of adult women was presented with a hypothetical "new" immunization that protected infants against respiratory complaints such as bronchitis and pneumonia Side effects (the common flu) were framed positively (90% chance of no side effects) or negatively (10% chance of side effects). The authors found positive framing to be superior for low-involved respondents, but there was no framing effect for high-involved respondents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10709794     DOI: 10.1177/109019810002700108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Behav        ISSN: 1090-1981


  8 in total

1.  Effective or ineffective: attribute framing and the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine.

Authors:  Cabral A Bigman; Joseph N Cappella; Robert C Hornik
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-09-18

2.  Positive Attribute Framing Increases COVID-19 Booster Vaccine Intention for Unfamiliar Vaccines.

Authors:  Kirsten Barnes; Ben Colagiuri
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-16

Review 3.  Describing treatment effects to patients.

Authors:  Annette Moxey; Dianne O'Connell; Patricia McGettigan; David Henry
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Prevalence and factors of influenza vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic among university students in China.

Authors:  Yanqiu Yu; Yee-Ling Ma; Sitong Luo; Suhua Wang; Junfeng Zhao; Guohua Zhang; Lijuan Li; Liping Li; Joseph Tak-Fai Lau
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.169

5.  Recruitment strategies should not be randomly selected: empirically improving recruitment success and diversity in developmental psychology research.

Authors:  Nicole A Sugden; Margaret C Moulson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-29

6.  Parental Decision-Making on Childhood Vaccination.

Authors:  Kaja Damnjanović; Johanna Graeber; Sandra Ilić; Wing Y Lam; Žan Lep; Sara Morales; Tero Pulkkinen; Loes Vingerhoets
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-13

7.  Ex-ante reminders: The effect of messaging strategies on reducing non-sustainable consumption behaviors in access-based services.

Authors:  Xiaorong Fu; Yang Xu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-06

Review 8.  What are judgment skills in health literacy? A psycho-cognitive perspective of judgment and decision-making research.

Authors:  Silvia Riva; Alessandro Antonietti; Paola Iannello; Gabriella Pravettoni
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 2.711

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.