Literature DB >> 10708667

Associations between incisor and mandibular condylar movements during maximum mouth opening in humans.

K H Travers1, P H Buschang, H Hayasaki, G S Throckmorton.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the common clinical assumption that condylar translation and mouth opening at the incisor are closely related. The sample studied comprised 27 adult females (23-35 years), selected for normal temporomandibular function, occlusion, and skeletal patterns. Condylar and mandibular central incisor movements (straight-line distances and curvilinear pathways) were recorded in three dimensions (3D) for 20 s with an optoelectric (Optotrak(R)) jaw-tracking system while each participant performed multiple maximum opening cycles. Masticatory analysis and multilevel statistical programs computed the 3D movements of the incisors and condylar hinge axis during opening and closing. The incisor point moved an average straight-line distance of 46.6 mm during opening and 45.9 mm during closing; the lengths of the opening and closing curvilinear pathways were 48.6 and 47.7 mm, respectively. The condyles moved average straight-line distances of 11.9 and 12.2 mm during opening and closing, respectively. The condyles' curvilinear pathways during opening and closing were 14 and 14.6 mm, respectively. Ranges of condylar movement varied widely between individuals. The straight-line distances and curvilinear pathways were highly correlated for the incisors (R=0.98) and the condyles (R=0.98). Neither the straight-line distances nor curvilinear pathways of the incisors were correlated with those of the condyles. Incisor straight-line distances and curvilinear pathways were moderately correlated with mandibular rotation (R(between subjects)=0.82 and R(between repeats)=0.88). During repeated openings, both condylar and incisor excursions increased, but during repeated closings only incisor excursions increased. It is concluded that (1) maximum incisor opening does not provide reliable information about condylar translation and its use as a diagnostic indicator of condylar movement should be limited, (2) healthy individuals may perform normal opening with highly variable amounts of condylar translation, (3) the straight-line distances of the incisor and condyles provide adequate information about the length of the curvilinear pathway, and (4) variation in maximum incisor opening is largely explained by variation in the amount of mandibular rotation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10708667     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9969(99)00140-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Oral Biol        ISSN: 0003-9969            Impact factor:   2.633


  14 in total

1.  Dynamic sagittal half-Fourier acquired single-shot turbo spin-echo MR imaging of the temporomandibular joint: initial experience and comparison with sagittal oblique proton-attenuation images.

Authors:  E Y Wang; T P Mulholland; B K Pramanik; A O Nusbaum; J Babb; A G Pavone; K E Fleisher
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Open versus closed reduction: diacapitular fractures of the mandibular condyle.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-07-28

3.  Response properties of trigeminal ganglion mechanosensitive neurons innervating the temporomandibular joint of the rabbit.

Authors:  Akito Tsuboi; Yasuo Takafuji; Shintaro Itoh; Kazuki Nagata; Takayoshi Tabata; Makoto Watanabe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Open-Mouth Bone Scintigraphy Is Better than Closed-Mouth Bone Scintigraphy in the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Ki Seong Park; Ho-Chun Song; Sang-Geon Cho; Sae-Ryung Kang; Jahae Kim; Haeng Man Jun; Minchul Song; Geum-Cheol Jeong; Hee Jeong Park; Seong Young Kwon; Jung-Joon Min; Henry Hee-Seung Bom
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-03-15

5.  Functional analysis of the rabbit temporomandibular joint using dynamic biplane imaging.

Authors:  Sarah E Henderson; Riddhi Desai; Scott Tashman; Alejandro J Almarza
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 6.  Temporomandibular disorders. Part 1: anatomy and examination/diagnosis.

Authors:  Stephen M Shaffer; Jean-Michel Brismée; Phillip S Sizer; Carol A Courtney
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2014-02

7.  In vivo three-dimensional mandibular kinematics and functional point trajectories during temporomandibular activities using 3d fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Chien-Chih Chen; Cheng-Chung Lin; Hong-Po Hsieh; Yang-Chieh Fu; Yunn-Jy Chen; Tung-Wu Lu
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Assessing the mobility of the mandibular condyle by sonography.

Authors:  Han-Yu Chen; Shyi-Kuen Wu; Chuan-Chin Lu; Jia-Yuan You; Chung-Liang Lai
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.711

9.  A computational method for recording and analysis of mandibular movements.

Authors:  Alan Petrônio Pinheiro; Adriano O Andrade; Adriano A Pereira; Douglas Bellomo
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

10.  Identification of arthropathy and myopathy of the temporomandibular syndrome by biomechanical facial features.

Authors:  Bruno Coelho Calil; Danilo Vieira da Cunha; Marcus Fraga Vieira; Adriano de Oliveira Andrade; Daniel Antônio Furtado; Douglas Peres Bellomo Junior; Adriano Alves Pereira
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.